Truth Prevails
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2008
- Messages
- 2,819
- Reaction score
- 4,867
Same here.Sometimes I think I'm a pendulum; swinging between a morning abduction or an evening one.
This is one of the big questions, and I ponder this when considering both AM and PM abduction theories. The easy answer for both AM & PM could be she was simply exiting her condo door to go to her vehicle. AM abduction could be because it was time to leave for work; PM abduction could be to retrieve the DVD from her car or _______ (please fill in the blank with your choice). I'm not saying she would have been easy to grab, but men can grab a women. Let's not make any mistake about that. Someone planned this well--they knew Jennifer's height and that she was able to defend herself. That would have been taken into account.If it was evening abduction how did 'they' get her out of her condo?
Considering that the crime of abduction or worse could have happened inside Jenn's condo--how could it have been left so clean? But, considering the condition of her vehicle when found, maybe the clean condition of the condo should not exclude these thoughts.
Something else: could Jennifer have been abducted in the hall just outside her condo door and pulled into the empty unlocked condo next door? I wonder how long before anyone checked there? Maybe "they" got Jenn's keys from her purse and went into her condo to shower.
Depending on what was done and left to be done in that unfinished condo, perhaps they could have taken her out in a big bin used for gathering old insulation or used flooring, etc. I'm horrified to think this, but I can't deny that I believe they would have had time. And this could probably work for an AM or PM abduction. Throw her in a garbage container of some sort, place garbage material on top, wheel the bin out. It could have been planned so well, that the person had somehow obtained a uniform or was able to dress like the workers for just long enough to complete the disposal. Maybe from a distance no-one would really notice because his actions appeared so normal. Risky, I know. But whoever we're looking for took some risks.
Certainly they could have. There is probably a hundred ways that could have happened.Did someone get hold of a key?
I can't think of a reason to firmly and definitely say "no" to this.Did someone get a key cut?
Yes. Her family most likely kept a spare set and her brother used them that weekend with the knowledge and permission of everyone. How well would they have been protected? It has to be considered plausible that someone could have "borrowed" them and copied them, because people can sneak and do things that some trusting individual would never expect or even think possible.The group who stayed at her condo must have had keys.
If LE did as little as we are led to believe, I would say no way to this. Maybe Mr. Kesse checked himself or had someone else do it, though. It's hard to say.Were all the local key cutters checked out?
It does, indeed.If the perpetrator got inside her condo then anything becomes possible.
I agree. How he explained his actions on the night of the 23rd to LE is something I would like very much to be privy to. Saying you were "stinking drunk" is not enough. Lots of "stinking drunk" guys commit crimes. So, I wonder how he explained himself. We know the bar surely closed at some point, so where did he go? Where was he in the morning--for those who believe in the morning abduction. LE had him in for questioning and I'm sure they wanted answers to those questions and a lot more. I don't know--maybe he passed a lie detector test and that was enough for them, for the time being. They say no one has been completely cleared--if this ever opens up again, say Jennifer is found, some of these people will be re-interviewed.What about an intoxicated ex?
If it it was a night time abduction he has a red flag.
True. I'm in the same boat. Maybe we need a new episode of the podcast.Wild thoughts? Sure, but hey things are getting desperate here.