IMO, I agree.I followed this case fairly closely when the news first came out about Caylee missing. I followed it until Caylee's remains were found and just paid passing interest to it until the beginning of testimony in the trial. Thus, I was not familiar with the evidence released over that time. Based on the evidence I've seen in the state's case I believe Casey is guilty. I also think the defense's explanation of events does more (at this point, before they present their evidence) to push me toward guilt than innocence. It's just too far fetched IMO. However, for whatever reason I'm hung up on the chloroform. We know Casey visited a site on making chloroform 84 times and we know evidence of chloroform was found in the trunk. But how did she get/make the chloroform? How hard is it either buy or make it? Is there any evidence whatsoever she purchased or had access to the ingredients she would need? Is there any evidence she bought, borrowed or stole any chloroform? If the state could present any evidence along those lines it would be a slam dunk for me.
Several people I know who don't follow the case were convinced of guilt after the defense opening statement. Its science fiction.