skatergirl
New Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2013
- Messages
- 246
- Reaction score
- 0
Ann Brocklehurst ‏@AnnB03 28s
Christina Noudga bail hearing will continue tomorrow
Christina Noudga bail hearing will continue tomorrow
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ann Brocklehurst ‏@AnnB03 28s
Christina Noudga bail hearing will continue tomorrow
Ann Brocklehurst @AnnB03
I knew I should have studied Russian
That's what I thought too Matou, they just came back from a break, and then lunch, for what seems like about 5 minutes, then decide to hold it over for a second day.Wow. Really? I hate the Canadian snail-jail process. Smile for your friends, Christina. pfffftttt.
Is this comment in relation to the bail hearing? It was posted two minutes before the tweet about CN's bail hearing being continued tomorrow which suggests ABro tweeted it from the courtroom.
Is this comment in relation to the bail hearing? It was posted two minutes before the tweet about CN's bail hearing being continued tomorrow which suggests ABro tweeted it from the courtroom.
She must have been overhearing her friends and family in the courtroom.
IIRC her family is Ukrainian.
Ann Brocklehurst @AnnB03 · 10m
Christina Noudga bail hearing covered by strict publication ban so nothing to report. Hearing open to public
That's ok. The judge can take as much time as needed. JMO
I think also to social media too. JMOHow can they expect word not to get out to the public/witnesses/potential jurors on what happened in court if the hearing is open to the public even with a publication ban? Do publication bans apply only to media or to Mr. Joe Public as well?
http://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/pub_ban.aspWhen a publication ban is imposed, the court record is available, subject to any other court orders limiting access, to any member of the public upon request to view and photocopy. It’s important to note that although the court record may be viewed and photocopied, details covered by the publication ban cannot be published, broadcast or transmitted within the meaning of the Criminal Code.
where is the hearing? maybe i will play hookey from work tomorrow and attend.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamil...aring-underway-in-tim-bosma-slaying-1.2722912A bail hearing being held in a Hamilton court for Christina Noudga, the Toronto-area woman who is charged as an accessory after the fact in the death of Ancaster, Ont., man Tim Bosma, will continue Thursday.
Though evidence pertaining to the Bosma trial was discussed in court, a publication ban exists on the proceedings — something that is common at bail hearings. The hearing is being handled in Superior Court.
Originally LE said there was another vehicle following, and then later ID'd that vehicle as same as DM's vehicle and were looking for a 3rd participant. Then later they said they weren't looking for anyone else. Why? Who says that CN doesn't know A LOT about what happened, ie even witnessed, or was present during parts of the crime(s)? If she did not participate in the abduction or the murder, then she would be only an accessory, correct? IMHO, I think there (hopefully) is some heavy duty bargaining for information going on between her and LE.
As an investigator, you always talk about tunnel vision and I think it’d be tunnel vision for me to say that I definitely believe there’s a third person or to say there wasn’t,” Staff Sergeant Matt Kavanagh said Wednesday. “It’s possible that there’s only two involved and it’s also possible that there may have been a third. And so we’re looking into that and we still have some doors to shut, some avenues of investigation.”
Is this comment in relation to the bail hearing? It was posted two minutes before the tweet about CN's bail hearing being continued tomorrow which suggests ABro tweeted it from the courtroom.
How can they expect word not to get out to the public/witnesses/potential jurors on what happened in court if the hearing is open to the public even with a publication ban? Do publication bans apply only to media or to Mr. Joe Public as well?
I don't know Arnie. I think if she was there they would have charged her with something for that date and let her defend herself.I just had a strange thought (theory) ... what if CN was the driver who dropped off DM & MS for the test drive , was completely innocent , had no knowledge of what was about to take place , and headed home or wherever.
Until May 9th when she put 2 & 2 together and realized that TB was the missing truck owner , and his house is where she had dropped them off
So at that point (May 9th) , because she now had knowledge of a crime , and did not report it , it made her guilty of being an accessory by trying to protecting DM by remaining silent.
Sounds convoluted , I know , maybe it is just a matter of careful technical legal jargon by prosecutors outlining that she was not a knowing participant until 2 1/2 days later