GUILTY TN - Chris Newsom, 23, & Channon Christian, 21, murdered, Knoxville, 6 Jan 2007 #19

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I really don't think that this judge is going to go lightly on her. I think he will give her as much as he possibly can. imo
 
You know I am so upset about this, but honestly how can we totally blame the jury when LE didn't have a clue for weeks that she was in on it. I'm sure that is part of the reason the jury came back with the verdict they did. I did have a gut feeling they were not going to charge her with 1st degree murder. While it makes sense everything the prosecution said about the role VC played, there really wasn't proof of her harming Channon (In my book her not helping Channon would get her the DP). I think we are all so close to the case we have seen the players much longer then this jury has, but unfortunately we were not on the jury. I think the Judge will do the best he can to keep her behind bars, without risking an appeal.
 
A former prosecutor with 30 years experience told me that jurors sometimes "pardon" defendants. This means they know the defendant is guilty, but decide to let them go for various reasons. He told me that if a juror or jurors don't want to convict, they will not convict. The evidence will not matter in cases like this.

I hope this will not happen, but if Coleman is not convicted of either murder it will not be because of the lack of evidence. Daphne Sutton would be one excuse. Another would be, well, the other three are convicted. Some jurors may have come in sympathetic to Coleman, period.

Now, she may be found guilty of the main charges, but I am laying out the reasons why it may not happen.

David from TN

The above is a post I made this morning.
David From TN
 
Oh no, what happened? I'm just trying to catch up. I guess it is as a few of you suspected and we did not get the outcome as hoped.
 
I haven't been able to watch lately and I appreciate everyone's great updates!! I am completely disheartened by the jury's decisions today.

Even though I feel like there are no victim's rights sometimes, guilty verdicts can offer some closure to victim's families. But today there was no closure, and there will never be any for Chris's family as no one was ever really charged with raping him if i remember correctly. I wish the jury could still hear the impact statements.

Thanks again to everyone for the awesome reporting. Looking towards the sentencing and hoping for the max sentence possible!!
 
I'm still trying to figure out what VC was smiling for. She's gonna wake up tomorrow and the day after and for years after and still be in jail.
 
From SuziQ's link above:

As the jury stood to leave the courtroom, the families of Christian and Newsom refused to stand as is customary.

"They don't deserve our respect," said Deena Christian.

Hugh Newsom was particularly incensed when he saw Coleman smiling as jurors announced the verdicts.

"She sat there in that house while this was going on, now she can sit there and smile...that's truly pathetic," Newsom said.

Coleman's father, Greg Coleman, was not pleased with the verdicts either.

"I think the system failed her from the beginning," Coleman said. "I was hoping they would find her not guilty."


-------------------------------------------------------------
I am just so outraged right now! I couldn't even put on my eyeliner after the verdict because my hand was shaking so bad! I'm putting my faith in the judge. I really think he will give her a very hefty sentence and stack them consecutively.

Vanessa's so dumb she probably thought she could go home while waiting on sentencing. I really don't think she understands the magnitude of the charges she was convicted of.

I would have been completely happy if they found her guilty of Channon's murder and not guilty on everything else. At least then she would have gotten LWOP.

I will never understand how the jury did not convict her of Channon's murder. Her DNA was on the bindings, she had Channon's property in her possession, and she admitted to being there the entire time Channon was there and when Channon was killed. It's not rocket science! If you throw out all of the lying statements Vanessa made, you still have these hard cold facts!

Can't wait to see the smile wiped off her face during sentencing when the judge throws the book at her! (I'm counting on it!)

We have to remember, the judge is not a stupid man, he knows she was in it up to her eyeballs!

Okay, sorry, rant over!
 
I just want to say 'Thanks' to all you great people for the daily posts that keep me updated. I usually come home from work to read at night, but today happened to be home and read your posts in real-time.
My heart breaks for Chris and Channon's families. I am putting my faith into the Judge giving VC the max sentence possible.
This brings up another thought. I am not one for self-justice, I rely on the law and God. However, I can understand why some people take things into their own hands. No way could I contain myself as Gary has these last few day, especially today when VC was laughing and smiling.
I have followed all of the trials in this case. It was discussed at one point that either Davidson or Cobbins had to be moved for his own protection from a certain group of people. I wonder if VC will also face that same threat? One way or the other, Channon and Chris deserve justice. I am just sick with this verdict and this jury.
 
If the judge stacks the sentences, it may be around 25 years. However, Tennessee procedure is not to stack sentences when the defendant does not have a long record or is young. A 15 year sentence for facilitiation usually results in parole after a third of the sentence. The same for a 25 year sentence.

Coleman has already been in jail for 3 years and I believe this will count against whatever the sentence turns out to be. She may serve around 8 years or less and be free well before her 30th birthday.

David From TN
 
If the judge stacks the sentences, it may be around 25 years. However, Tennessee procedure is not to stack sentences when the defendant does not have a long record or is young. A 15 year sentence for facilitiation usually results in parole after a third of the sentence. The same for a 25 year sentence.

Coleman has already been in jail for 3 years and I believe this will count against whatever the sentence turns out to be. She may serve around 8 years or less and be free well before her 30th birthday.

David From TN

Wow that is just to sad to think about. I guess we can be thankful the jury didn't believe she was being held against her will or she would have walked today.........I am just so heartbroken for the families.
 
If the judge stacks the sentences, it may be around 25 years. However, Tennessee procedure is not to stack sentences when the defendant does not have a long record or is young. A 15 year sentence for facilitiation usually results in parole after a third of the sentence. The same for a 25 year sentence.

Coleman has already been in jail for 3 years and I believe this will count against whatever the sentence turns out to be. She may serve around 8 years or less and be free well before her 30th birthday.

David From TN

She was convicted of facilitation on some of the other charges, so doesn't that mean she is facing 15-25 years on each facilitation charge? So if the judge gave her sentences consecutively and doesn't merge any of the charges, wouldn't that mean she is facing at the very least a 15 years sentence on each of those? Of course they'd have to be stacked to make it a long sentence.
 
HOW is facilitating a murder not the same as the murder itself?

If the person KNOWS that a murder is taking place, facilitating is ALLOWING it to happen. She HAS to get life or something close to it. Praying for the judge to stack like firewood.

So if I drive someone to a murder, and I knew it was happening/going to happen... would I be not guilty of the murder? I am disgusted beyond comprehension.

William N said:
If the judge stacks the sentences, it may be around 25 years. However, Tennessee procedure is not to stack sentences when the defendant does not have a long record or is young. A 15 year sentence for facilitiation usually results in parole after a third of the sentence. The same for a 25 year sentence.

Coleman has already been in jail for 3 years and I believe this will count against whatever the sentence turns out to be. She may serve around 8 years or less and be free well before her 30th birthday.

David From TN

I've read that about not stacking sentences for first offenders, but I two things give me hope (just enough to save my sanity on this day):

1. I have also read that she has a juvenile record for assault. Have you seen or heard anything about that? If so, the judge should be able to see that.

2. The magnitude of the crimes for which she was found guilty of facilitation. Judge B cited that when he was sentencing the others.

We are disgusted by their finding her "only" guilty of facilitation, but as dgfred says, facilitation alone is a very despicable crime:

FACILITATION OF A FELONY
Any person who commits the offense of facilitation of a felony is guilty of a
crime. For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the state must have proven
beyond a reasonable doubt the following essential elements:

(1) that the defendant knew that another person intended to commit the
specific felony, but did not have the intent to promote or assist the
commission of the offense or to benefit in the proceeds or results of
the offense;
and
(2) that the defendant furnished substantial assistance to that person in
the commission of the felony;
and
(3) that the defendant furnished such assistance knowingly.


"Intent", as used above, means that a person acts intentionally with respect to the
nature of the conduct and to a result of the conduct when it is the person's conscious
objective or desire to engage in the conduct and cause the result.

"Knowingly", as used above, means that a person acts knowingly when the
person is aware of the particular nature of the conduct and that the particular
circumstances exist and that the conduct is reasonably certain to cause the result.
The
requirement of "knowingly" is also established if it is shown that the defendant acted
“intentionally.”​

So, even though they acquitted her of the "Intent" part, even this jury said that VC knowingly furnished substantial assistance in these crimes:

First degree felony murder of Channon Christian during the perpetration of kidnapping of Hugh Christopher Newsom.

First degree felony murder of Channon Christian, during the perpetration of kidnapping of Channon Christian.

First degree felony murder of Channon Christian, during the perpetration of rape by oral penetration of Channon Christian.

First degree felony murder of Channon Christian, during the perpetration of theft of Channon Christian.

Premeditated first degree murder of Channon Christian.

Especially aggravated kidnapping of Channon Christian accomplished with a deadly weapon.

Especially aggravated kidnapping of Channon Christian accomplished with serious bodily injury.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian, by coercive anal penetration while armed with a weapon.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian, by coercive oral penetration while armed with a weapon.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian, by coercive vaginal penetration while armed with a weapon.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian, by anal penetration with bodily injury.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian by oral penetration with bodily injury.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian by vaginal penetration with bodily injury.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian by coercive anal penetration while aided and abetted by one or more persons.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian by coercive oral penetration while aided and abetted by one or more persons.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian by coercive vaginal penetration while aided and abetted by one or more persons.

Theft of property of Channon Christian, valued at $10,000 or more but less than $60,000.​

Not all of those carry a 15-25 yr sentence, but at least the first 6 do, and I cannot imagine Judge B giving her the minimum sentence for them or for all those 11 others, and then to have them run concurrently, considering the extreme, depraved nature of them and her obvious lack of remorse.

I may be very disappointed, but until then, I have to have faith that he'll find a way to at least make sure she's not out before she's 40.
This monstrosity should never be allowed to breed.
 
I've read that about not stacking sentences for first offenders, but I two things give me hope (just enough to save my sanity on this day):

1. I have also read that she has a juvenile record for assault. Have you seen or heard anything about that? If so, the judge should be able to see that.

2. The magnitude of the crimes for which she was found guilty of facilitation. Judge B cited that when he was sentencing the others.

We are disgusted by their finding her "only" guilty of facilitation, but as dgfred says, facilitation alone is a very despicable crime:

FACILITATION OF A FELONY
Any person who commits the offense of facilitation of a felony is guilty of a
crime. For you to find the defendant guilty of this offense, the state must have proven
beyond a reasonable doubt the following essential elements:

(1) that the defendant knew that another person intended to commit the
specific felony, but did not have the intent to promote or assist the
commission of the offense or to benefit in the proceeds or results of
the offense;
and
(2) that the defendant furnished substantial assistance to that person in
the commission of the felony;
and
(3) that the defendant furnished such assistance knowingly.


"Intent", as used above, means that a person acts intentionally with respect to the
nature of the conduct and to a result of the conduct when it is the person's conscious
objective or desire to engage in the conduct and cause the result.

"Knowingly", as used above, means that a person acts knowingly when the
person is aware of the particular nature of the conduct and that the particular
circumstances exist and that the conduct is reasonably certain to cause the result.
The
requirement of "knowingly" is also established if it is shown that the defendant acted
“intentionally.”​

So, even though they acquitted her of the "Intent" part, even this jury said that VC knowingly furnished substantial assistance in these crimes:

First degree felony murder of Channon Christian during the perpetration of kidnapping of Hugh Christopher Newsom.

First degree felony murder of Channon Christian, during the perpetration of kidnapping of Channon Christian.

First degree felony murder of Channon Christian, during the perpetration of rape by oral penetration of Channon Christian.

First degree felony murder of Channon Christian, during the perpetration of theft of Channon Christian.

Premeditated first degree murder of Channon Christian.

Especially aggravated kidnapping of Channon Christian accomplished with a deadly weapon.

Especially aggravated kidnapping of Channon Christian accomplished with serious bodily injury.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian, by coercive anal penetration while armed with a weapon.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian, by coercive oral penetration while armed with a weapon.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian, by coercive vaginal penetration while armed with a weapon.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian, by anal penetration with bodily injury.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian by oral penetration with bodily injury.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian by vaginal penetration with bodily injury.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian by coercive anal penetration while aided and abetted by one or more persons.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian by coercive oral penetration while aided and abetted by one or more persons.

Aggravated rape of Channon Christian by coercive vaginal penetration while aided and abetted by one or more persons.

Theft of property of Channon Christian, valued at $10,000 or more but less than $60,000.​

Not all of those carry a 15-25 yr sentence, but at least the first 6 do, and I cannot imagine Judge B giving her the minimum sentence for them or for all those 11 others, and then to have them run concurrently, considering the extreme, depraved nature of them and her obvious lack of remorse.

I may be very disappointed, but until then, I have to have faith that he'll find a way to at least make sure she's not out before she's 40.
This monstrosity should never be allowed to breed.

Just think if he gives her the max on the first 6 charges and runs them consecutively, she will get a sentence of 150 years!!!!!!

ETA: 90 years if he gives her the minimum!
 
I wonder what she will have to say if anything at her sentencing hearing. After sitting back and really thinking about it (not that I like it) I don't think the jury had a choice but to sentence her the way they did.....don't jump me because I don't like it either, but you do have to go by the law and that was the way it was explained to them. Maybe we just need to change the law.
 
I was driving home still livid about all of this and something hit me...wasn't it mentioned in the trail that the handwriting sample that they used to verify her handwriting was from a letter that she wrote Rome while in jail? Wouldn't that fact alone make you stop and think...wait why is she writing someone STILL who held her captive and was physically abusive towards her and she was soooooooooo scared of? I just really can not wrap my mind around how this happened today.
 
I wonder what she will have to say if anything at her sentencing hearing. After sitting back and really thinking about it (not that I like it) I don't think the jury had a choice but to sentence her the way they did.....don't jump me because I don't like it either, but you do have to go by the law and that was the way it was explained to them. Maybe we just need to change the law.

Or maybe we need to not use big words on verdict forms! I understand what you are saying, I'm just perplexed over the jury not finding her responsible for Channon's murder.
 
I was driving home still livid about all of this and something hit me...wasn't it mentioned in the trail that the handwriting sample that they used to verify her handwriting was from a letter that she wrote Rome while in jail? Wouldn't that fact alone make you stop and think...wait why is she writing someone STILL who held her captive and was physically abusive towards her and she was soooooooooo scared of? I just really can not wrap my mind around how this happened today.

I could be wrong, but I thought the letter was to her parents.

:grouphug: I'm as livid as you are! My heart just breaks for the families. Judge B is their only hope at this point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
157
Guests online
271
Total visitors
428

Forum statistics

Threads
609,302
Messages
18,252,332
Members
234,606
Latest member
UnsolvedChef86
Back
Top