It doesn’t imply anything just an observation.Can you help me understand what this implies? TIA
I guess it's close to this guy's apartment, and they're searching for evidence. The reason why hasn't been confirmed.How is the McDonalds related?
Dump site I'm sure. They have an accessible dumpster at most locations, so it's a natural place to dump evidence.
Yup, I did see that. This reporter is citing a Facebook post, which isn't typically standard practice. I believe it though.
Reporter from WREG (MSM) is saying a McDonald's employee found Liza's clothes in a dumpster.
Help me understand? If they didn’t know who they were dealing with, they would need help identifying perpetrator(s), right?There's no reason to. Once he is charged, his mugshot will be available. At that point I'm sure they'll receive tips from people who perhaps encountered him during the timeframe in question.
Law enforcement doesn't typically identify persons of interest or suspects anymore, at least before they are charged.
Starting not to sound good. Pray she will be found aliveYup, I did see that. This reporter is citing a Facebook post, which isn't typically standard practice. I believe it though.
Help me understand? If they didn’t know who they were dealing with, they would need help identifying perpetrator(s), right?
But they have detained a person (not arrested)… so do you think they know the identity of the abductor, or not?
Sorry if this seems dense…
This is why I thought they might ask for assistance.I believe that the person they detained was the person driving the car. I’d guess that they know his identity—his name, etc. However, at this point, they may not have proof that he’s the abductor. Heck, he might not even be the abductor.
So when we had radio silence from law enforcement today, I found that to be incredibly unusual. The early hours and days of an investigation like this tend to be pretty chaotic, and there's a lot of activity.Help me understand? If they didn’t know who they were dealing with, they would need help identifying perpetrator(s), right?
But they have detained a person (not arrested)… so do you think they know the identity of the abductor, or not?
Sorry if this seems dense…
You saw that tweet also, huh?I hope LE checks dumpsters at that shopping center.
Yup, I did see that. This reporter is citing a Facebook post, which isn't typically standard practice. I believe it though.
I have a feeling he is just someone who found the car abandoned and took it. Just a feeling, knowing the area of the apartments that it was found in. Robberies and carjackings are typical. High profile kidnappings, not so much.I believe that the person they detained was the person driving the car. I’d guess that they know his identity—his name, etc. However, at this point, they may not have proof that he’s the abductor. Heck, he might not even be the abductor.