I will agree that until they show the LE marking his name off the list with a permanent marker, it isn't official, but I haven't seen them mark off Arlene's either, or anyone else for that matter, and yes, if they are really looking into this, they have to look at Arlene and anyone else that Gail would have had dealings with. Basically, they have said, over and over, that they don't see any crime, they don't see foul play, they have to keep looking, in the event something is found, but nothing yet. The searches were obviously not a big priority, they could have done them sooner, they could most likely have gotten a SW, they didn't. Even with permission, they still haven't done them all yet. From JBean's info earlier, we know that she left because she chose to do so, they can't find any foul play or evidence of crime, soooo, why should Matt have to prove himself innocent to anyone? His actions don't make him look guilty, they just don't satisfy the hunger the public has to hear what he knows, so the public keeps pushing. If they push enough, he will break and tell every dirty detail. Right? Matt has the American right of "innocent until proven guilty". The police have not found anything for him to be proven guilty of.