It's not being confused with the "scream" from the neighbor.. It's something that was known and discussed as early as a couple weeks into the investigation..
Woman working at local school with Karen said she heard Karen
scream and cry uncontrollably upon hearing news that her daughter may have been abducted
http://www.examiner.com/missing-pers...ws-something-1
As well as Ms. Facetious also posted where she had read it as blood curdling scream from another source she linked(can be found in this thread)..
Some may recall the much discussion that came from this topic back one month into the investigation.. I posted some of my personal posts from that time(May 15) just one page back in this thread.. This isn't new information but rather something known from early on that In reviewing the case from start to finish I chose to bring forward this topic of discussion and I obviously agree with Old Steve in that I feel there is something important within this issue.. Sadly, Old Steve as much as you and I long to have the answer to this important question it's likely we'll not get it.. As we've all seen, tho not from lack of trying, we do seem to be met with brick walls that cannot be broken down, nor can they be climbed which is necessary to be able to move forward.. So, for now once again at a standstill..
I do want to however voice my confusion as to why these particular issues that are valid and relevant and in no way breaking any of the TOS.. Why it is that by some it is seen as wrong or stooping low beneath what we WSers are capable of.. This is baffling to me because I disagree in that there are some very real questionable and thus far unexplainable issues with the case.. I think all can agree with that.. And that in discussing and questioning some of those issues that involve the family it is no way whatsoever accusing any of them of involvement in harming Holly.. I believe I, and others have expressed that throughout.. There are very real indicators that this was NO STRANGER STALKER ABDUCTION, but rather the complete opposite in that the perp was known very well in some capacity to Holly and her family.. This discussion has brought forth some very relevant theories and discussions of the different possibilities.. One of the latest being that the family was aware of prior issues with a male leading up to the abduction.. I find this to be not only just plausible, but absolutely possible..
Why then are these discussions being very much looked down upon and open disdain posted about such discussions??? No one is in any way whatsoever accusing the family of hurting Holly, no one is demeaning Holly or her family, nor disrespecting them by asking the very valid and relevant questions that we are in discussing this vein as a possibility..*
It seems as tho if any of us dare to broach these areas, and again these areas that some of feel are very plausible as well as possible, but if we dare to step out of the discussion of keeping to the benefits and just asking very general and vague questions of "I just wonder how this happened" or "where's Holly?".. If the discussion progresses into something much more in-depth and in breaking down specifics of the little that we know.. That of course includes the Bobo family.. This is off-putting to say the least to some and posted as if we are behaving in a way unbecoming to the WS site.. I just find that confusing?? In a case where there is already so much confusion why are those who are choosing to go back and review from the beginning, hitting on specific topics or issues that some of us may feel are important or key to the case.. Why is this so offensive?? I truly cannot grasp what it is that we are discussing that is in way "low brow".. We're not.. It's just not the case.. Some may feel as tho they don't believe it to have any relevance and that's ok.. There's plenty I've seen discussed here that I felt had zero relevance and I had nothing or very little to add to those areas.. And that was ok, too.. I just do not understand the open disdain and criticism of us who are choosing to discuss what we feel are important pieces to this difficult puzzle Of the investigation of this beautiful GIRL's abduction.. No one is disrespecting or discussing "low brow" topics and following TOS.. That said it doesn't make sense for some to be disgusted with open disdain for these discussions taking place..
The only other point I want to quickly address is touching on something others discussed yesterday.. With the examiner and one reporter in particular I believe at great lengths much earlier in this case is was agreed upon that her reporting was very accurate and detailed in the Bobo case specifically.. We have been using and relying on her reporting for much of this case in case some have forgotten or were not aware.. Refreshing one's memory looking back this is easily verified as true.. So while I believe some like Chelsea from gather may be an interesting read.. However I wouldn't rely on it for any facts.. But as far as the particular reporter for the examiner I know that early on she was decided as a very good and accurate resource for Holly's case.. Again easily verified by looking back thru the case..
Just a few questions or concerns I had and not meant to be argumentative in any way whatsoever.. I feel we all have a place here for Holly and all have valuable opinions and views that are all worth discussing (of course all within TOS) jmo, tho!
