marycarney
Inactive
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,794
- Reaction score
- 118
This case makes me nuts. I cannot get away from the hinky feeling I have about her brother. Just can't shake it. Curious.
Whew!
The problem as I see it is that some are prone to take certain aspects and make up a whole new theory, adding suppositions and speculations as they go to make the facts fit their theory. That's when it starts to get complicated. I prefer the K.I.S.S. method myself. When you have to invent things just to explain points in your theory, it just simply doesn't work.
I don't know why it wouldn't be just as simple and easy to believe that Holly was kidnapped by some guy she may or may not have been acquainted with. Either they stalked her, or just followed her home and waited for their chance. All these theories of her running away for whatever reason, or a community-wide coverup involving not only the sheriff's dept. but TBI is just mind-boggling. It's even possible that her boyfriend was the perp, but I think LE would have figured that out by now.
I don't buy that she ran away for any reason. I don't buy that LE are crooked and covering up for some big-shot in the community. I don't buy that the sheriff/pastor had any involvement, either in the actual kidnapping or the coverup. There is simply no evidence to point to any of those scenarios. And being from the South myself I highly resent the implication that we are all crooked as snakes and so stupid we couldn't pour pee out of a boot with the directions on the heel. There are good and bad in ANY profession, and I would bet my boots that this is true in all 50 states. Not to mention the thousands of missing persons cases all over the country that have never been solved.
I don't mind reading and considering other theories but a decent theory should be supported by facts, not speculations.
Why would a stranger approach her at the house? There had to be at least two cars parked there if Clint was at the house. Even the craziest of perps would have to think x2 about that. So if Clint's car was there, who would walk right up to the carport and harm her?
She dropped the coke can and bled, yet managed to carry her books and bag to the perp's car? Do I believe it happened like that? nope.
Why would Clint think it was ok if it was Drew who was leading her into the woods @ 7:45am? Do I believe that? nope.
.....Why would Clint lie? It would have to be he is covering for somebody...imo.
One would think something like that should be confirmed or denied by LE shouldn't it? They said her lunch bag was found and where it was found so why wouldn't they tell the public about her books and papers......and her cellphone?:waitasec:
They don't confirm anything. I see no reason why the public can't be informed. They obviously don't agree.
They protect their own. Anywhere else that pastor who killed the father of the bride in Darden/Decatur would have been charged with negligent homicide. I stand by my observation that the LE there are a different breed.
The thing is with theories...
LE, the TBI and FBI (and the mods here) have said this is an ABDUCTION. So just throwing all that out the window and saying Holly ran away, or was somehow killed at home, the family is covering up etc. just goes against what little bit about her disappearance has been established or held to be true.
There IS evidence she was abducted. There is zero evidence she ran away, family hid her body in a car trunk, etc.
Theories and hypothesis are still based on evidence, fact, logic.
Even if Clint did NOT see ANY of what happened, there is still evidence of an abduction. Actually most of what we know does not have much to do with Clint's two brief glimpses of the subject. Clint did not have to see Holly and the subject in the garage for us to know Holly was there because of the blood found. Clint did not have to see them walking to the woods because LE said they had found the point the pair had entered the woods. We know there were screams or a scream as a neighbor heard those. The time line is pretty much established by independent sources (scream, 911 calls, neighbor and cops arriving at the home etc.)
That says something right there. If they could track to the woods, why couldn't they go even further. Scent on the ground through the yard, but nothing on all the brush, leaves and tree limbs the two would of had to touched? So yes they tracked them to the edge of the woods, but what happen next? Did the perp just want it too look as if they went into the woods and double back to a vehicle? Maybe told Clint to say they went into the woods under threat to kill Holly right then? I honestly don't know, but I don't believe it went down as described. JMO
Do you mean local LE in Decatur county? I thought TBI did a tremendous job with the Bain case. Why was that case different? Did the county ask for State assistance in the Bain case whereas in Holly's, local LE told them, eh, we can handle it? Or was it because 2 States were involved in the Bain case?
I agree with Judge Judy "if it dosen't make sense its not true" and nothing about the stories from the morning of the abduction makes any sense to me. I don't know what happened I wasen't there but I don't believe the story Clint told it just dosen't make sense. If he heard Holly and who he thought was Drew squatted down looking at a turkey why didn't he go out to look at it too? Why call mama at her job to ask her whats going on when he is right there? Don't buy it at all. I would think if he was scared he would call his dad instead of his mom. There were several firearms at his disposal why not get one and go outside to see. Then he makes the statement that he don't think they will see Holly for a long time how does he know this? What does anyone else think about these questions?
This case makes me nuts.
I cannot get away from the hinky feeling I have about her brother.
Just can't shake it. Curious.
Oh,there is plenty of misinformation and blame to pass around.
Giving inaccurate or downright false inforation is a pattern that has played out over and over.
Perhaps America Most Wanted did misspeak when 'cousin' was used in the segment dealing with Holly. Maybe,Clint said 'cousin' or maybe he didn't to John Walsh.
Our lone eye witness has changed and obsured his account so many times ...
I challenge anyone to give me a clear narrative of events that
morning.
Then we have relatives and family who are trotted out ~a reality star cousin (who sings)and lectures that we don't know the real story..and she does???
Then,perhaps she could share with us for starters 'where is Holly'.
The lone fact is ...we are no closer to either the truth or finding Holly now than over a year ago. MOO
Why was Drew hunting on Grandma's property on the other side of town and not at his GF's property?
....Karen gave him permission, she says.
Karen never told Holly about it.
Drew tells Holly about being confronted. I have to wonder if he did this in person and not by phone...
Why was Drew hunting on Grandma's property on the other side of town and not at his GF's property?
....Karen gave him permission, she says. Karen never told Holly about it. Drew tells Holly about being confronted. I have to wonder if he did this in person and not by phone.
Whisperer, All those early phone calls that morning about a simple hunting dispute.
That same morning, within an hour or so of those calls, the neighbor hears a loud argument coming from the B. property..what a coincidence.
Let's hope LE throughly checked the pings and cells phones of everyone.