Carla Lashelle
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 2,216
- Reaction score
- 7
Good interview with Christopher Voss, former FBI on Fox News. While it offered nothing new it didnt rehash the old "dragged into the woods" inaccuracies either.
No and the tester was clear about how the test worked and was very good at explaining things and doing the pre test introduction, etc. The process is way more complex than you would think on TV and the whole episode was several hours long. And again, unlike TV, the questions they asked were no surprise because I answered them multiple times "off the record"... at the end they just rig you up with the electrodes, etc and ask again for the actual test. And unlike TV they didnt have the needle and paper machine but its all done on a computer. My polygrapher said the paper test was not widely used any more but it looked good on tv so you still see it there.
I knew I was innocent but was very scared. I was being accused of mailing steroids to an undercover police sting address. Out of the blue one day investigators just showed up at my house and started badgering me. Hence the test. But I passed the test, they kinda said sorry about that, and went back to Miami.
Hi, first time posting. Could someone tell me how I can get to the scanner posts? Thanks!
Clu has referred to the Jenni-Lyn Watson case several times now as similar and I totally agree. Jenni-Lyn was the same age as Holly, and went missing the weekend before Thanksgiving last fall while home on a break from college. She was found 8 days later, and her very recent ex-boyfriend has been charged with her murder. The difference in discussion and speculation was that it was established early on that Jenni-Lyn had indeed recently ended an engagement and that it had not gone well.
In this case I think the confusion about exes is that perhaps there may have been a VERY recent break-up, or attempt to set distance in a relationship that perhaps was not as formal as a so-called break-up, and so it was not really clear to any friends or family if it was on or off. Maybe even the couple themselves weren't sure of their status. I think that is not unusual at all in relationships, especially in young folks. This might explain why it hasn't really been clear if or who were Holly's current or ex boyfriends.
Please know I am not accusing anyone of involvement here, just trying to understand the confusion I have felt and make some sense of something so senseless.
And had not thought of it this way, and haven't heard anyone say anything like this.I wish we could get more info on the brothers initial statement and actions. What did he say exactly. Exactly why did he look out the window? If we could get those answers, I think everyone might feel better about the brother.
Was just thinking. Maybe the brother did say dragged into the woods but didn't mean literally. Maybe he meant 'persuaded'. Maybe I am reaching, but I can see me saying something like that if I felt like the person was leading someone into the woods and I thought they didn't really want to go. You hear it all the time in reference to a conversation. Two people have a heated discussion and then look to get someone else's opinion. That person says "Don't drag me into it".
Maybe by body language he could tell his sister didn't want to go, or maybe he was thinking the boyfriend was hunting and heading back into the woods to show Holly something. boyfriend was going back into the woods and dragging Holly along.
Just saying, the brother could have used the term dragged or dragging along and not meant it literally.
This IMO is the reason for the passage of time with no 911 call immediately..Why would he when he saw what he thought was his sister outside talking with her boyfriend??..IMO it was only later when he heard loud voices[stated as arguing in an article]that he actually went outside to see exactly what was going on IMO it was at that time that he saw the blood on the carport and could not locate his sister
_______________
This is the only article I've read that says the brother heard arguing (correct me if I'm wrong):
(I bolded to place emphasis) I believe this is where we all started believing that Holly had an ex-boyfriend who was arguing with her. And it's not our imagination. It's a news article? Since when do news articles report heresay, inuendo and rumor?
Aren't news reporters supposed to check their facts? Or if a reporter made a mistake, retract?
and it says the ex-boyfriend not the boyfriend
--------------------------------
http://www.examiner.com/missing-per...fbi-says-led-away-not-dragged-through-carport
Holly left the house to go to school and her brother heard her arguing with her ex-boyfriend who was dressed in camo, outside the home.
also in the article:
About an hour later he noticed his sister's car was still in the driveway. He called his parents, a friend of Holly's and then the ex-boyfriend, and then the police.
And had not thought of it this way, and haven't heard anyone say anything like this.
This is a VERY good explanation of what could have happened. It helps to understand why the TBI "clarified" their initial statement from last Wednesday.
I will admit that I was having trouble understanding how he could see her being literally dragged, and not be extremely alarmed. But knowing how some of us "country" people talk, I can see that he might not have actually meant literally dragged.
Thanks for the explanation!