I have a lot of ideas about this case, most of which I've already posted to the topix thread. I'm wondering if le ever conducted a search of the bf's car? Technically, that was the last place she was "said" to have been.
Practically, it may well have been the last place she was. I'm going to be frank, and I hope not to offend anyone. I know people do hide remains on their own property, and perhaps this guy would have done that, being as possessive as he was, but I just think it's more likely that even if she and her child were killed in his home, he might have transported them elsewhere and there might be evidence in the car.
I was also wondering - Does the family have access to any of his friends who might know if there are specific favorite places this guy has used for hunting/fishing/4-wheeling (or whatever else), in the past? I live in rural/small-town Alabama, and I'm sure its similar to small-town TN in many ways. I know that many of the boys here grew up hunting, and they have areas with which they are more familiar than others.
If he took her somewhere other than his family's property, is there any information about him that would suggest which areas he'd be most likely to frequent? Also, sometimes you see in these cases that a significant other telegraphs the area where they've left remains by saying that it was the last place they saw the person alive. Or they talk about the location a lot, suggesting that it should be searched. Of course, sometimes they do the complete opposite in order to mislead... But anyway, are there any areas this guy frequents, or talks about, or has mentioned, or any way to find anything out about that?
Was there any search of the land at the intersection where he said he last saw her?