I need to thoroughly read this thread.
I know there are other people from Tennessee here.
Honestly, it has more relevance to the discussion than overly emotional posts that decree them both guilty before the trial and "monsters" etc.How is whether or not the father may be on the autism spectrum relevant to the discussion of Joe's murder?
Honestly, it has more relevance to the discussion than overly emotional posts that decree them both guilty before the trial and "monsters" etc.
These people haven't gone on trial yet, so the situation isn't black and white and the mental health status of the perps should factor into the reason for the crime, understanding how and why and how to prevent - more so than lynch mob mentality or empty discussion about how a poster was right or is horrified, don't you think?
Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk
Not really. We have heard NOTHING about the mother or father having any sort of mental health issues or disabilities. So I don't see what good it does to speculate on such things. All it does it make people start to fear those with autism or whatever else is mentioned. It's awful.
That's fair enough, but the "They're monsters" rubbish should be stopped too, because that does nothing. Calling them monsters is pretty bad, especially if it turns out they do have a mental illness. I mean, you wouldn't want that either. But yet, every second post is that.Not really. We have heard NOTHING about the mother or father having any sort of mental health issues or disabilities. So I don't see what good it does to speculate on such things. All it does it make people start to fear those with autism or whatever else is mentioned. It's awful.