I'm no legal beagle, but what are you looking for from this page?
https://www.scribd.com/document/348577100/TC-Exhibit-and-Witness-List
My thanks button won't work, so thank you for this.
I'm no legal beagle, but what are you looking for from this page?
https://www.scribd.com/document/348577100/TC-Exhibit-and-Witness-List
TC allegedly deceived JC regarding the reason he took out a loan. So that *might* play into the financial settlement. Wild guessing here, really, anyone's guess is as good as mine.Sorry if this is a dumb question, but why would they be a defendant?
In one of the docs posted above, his attorney says he depressed and suffering from mental stress.
But most likely. He will be out of jail in 5years. Jmo
@ gardenista and kapua, who else would be named as a defendant in a divorce case?
I was actually thinking the daughter, whose name was assigned to the house while tad was still missing? Because JC is now trying to protect her assets and her daughters are backing TC? I don't know. totally speculating. I just find it very odd.
I know a few of you WS were also following along to Makayla Chang who was 16 and missing here in Canada.
She was found today and sadly her outcome did end up good by any means. Hope it's ok to post here. Her thread is so quiet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sleeping with a underage student is one thing.
But Tad went above and beyond that and didn't hesitate to put his own family in a position to hold the bags while he took off with his student/victim.
So he only has himself to blame and I hope his family lets him rot.
But most likely. He will be out of jail in 5years. Jmo
Thank you for the O/T...I wanted so badly for her to be okay. :cry:
JMO
Agreed. The age of consent laws are strict liability so I don't think he'll walk, but unless they find something like child *advertiser censored* on his computers/phones, I think he'll plea down to something like statutory rape and only get a few years. I go back and forth but I don't think I'd want to bring this one to trial - I think it would be traumatizing for ET, she would have to be cross-examined by the defense in open court.
In Tennessee, when we join parties they must be characterized as plaintiff, defendant, petitioner, or respondent in terms of role.Sometimes retirement plans are named. In CA we
join them though. They aren't named "defendants". But neither is the other spouse.
I have a hard time understanding how a father of daughters could do what he did to MCET for openers. Just vile.