Found Safe TN - SLP, 14, Madisonville, Monroe County, 13 Jan 2019 #4 *ARRESTS*

[oviedo]

Gwinnett County - Case Search - By Party Name
and the divorce docket
Gwinnett County - Case Search - Case Details

• Randall L Pruitt (Plaintiff)
  
• Christina Pruitt (Defendant)
  
• R Scott Estes (Attorney for Plaintiff)
  Bar #: 250688, Tel: (770) 910-9128
  
• Lance D Crawford (Attorney for Defendant)
  Bar #: 194105, Tel: (678) 775-6790

• 2016-01-12 - DISMISSAL ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

ETA: He filed for the divorce - something happened in between August 7 and January 12 - there was no request for production of documents, no financial affidavits, etc on the docket - to me, it looks like an empty threat. He got what he wanted in the end IMO. whatever that was...

Note:
Disposition: Dismissed Without Prejudice
Category: Divorce Disposition Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2016

Note : almost 3 years to the date of the dismissal of the divorce SP left (Jan 13 2019)

 

[JudgeJoe]

Why would his past history be relevant to rescuing SP? I don't believe it is IMO and just provides potential excuses for his depravity.

BR’s actions do not conclude, WOASOAD, “depravity”. His past history is highly relevant to his decision making process. Which determines intent. Which is considered in every criminal case in America. Not going to debate this further. It’s MOO. New evidence might change MOO, but rehashing what we’ve aready got won’t.

 

[OhThatVictoria]

BR’s actions do not conclude, WOASOAD, “depravity”. His past history is highly relevant to his decision making process. Which determines intent. Which is considered in every criminal case in America. Not going to debate this further. It’s MOO. New evidence might change MOO, but rehashing what we’ve aready got won’t.

Not enough information . . .

 

[Julia966]

Gwinnett County - Case Search - By Party Name
and the divorce docket
Gwinnett County - Case Search - Case Details

• Randall L Pruitt (Plaintiff)
  
• Christina Pruitt (Defendant)
  
• R Scott Estes (Attorney for Plaintiff)
  Bar #: 250688, Tel: (770) 910-9128
  
• Lance D Crawford (Attorney for Defendant)
  Bar #: 194105, Tel: (678) 775-6790

• 2015-07-29 - Summons ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
  
  
• 2015-07-29 - Complaint ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
  
  
• 2015-07-29 - MUTUAL RESTRAINING ORDER
  
  
• 2015-07-29 - ORDER - PARENTING SEMINAR
  
  
• 2015-07-29 - STANDING ORDER SUPPORT COMPUTATION
  
  
• 2015-07-29 - DOMESTIC RELATIONS CAS FILE INF FR ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
  
  
• 2015-07-31 - MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROCESS ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
  
  
• 2015-07-31 - AFFIDAVIT PROCESS SERVER ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
  
  
• 2015-08-03 - MOTION FOR EMERGENCY HEARING ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
  
  
• 2015-08-03 - AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
  
  
• 2015-08-05 - ORDER APPOINTING PROCESS SERVER
  
  
• 2015-08-05 - ORDER SETTING HEARING
  
  
• 2015-08-07 - CONSENT ORDER
  
  
• 2015-08-07 - Entry of Appearance/Appearance of ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
  
  
• 2016-01-12 - DISMISSAL ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

ETA: He filed for the divorce - something happened in between August 7 and January 12 - there was no request for production of documents, no financial affidavits, etc on the docket - to me, it looks like an empty threat. He got what he wanted in the end IMO. whatever that was...

Mutual restraining orders and parenting seminar. Interesting. And thanks for finding it!

 

[dixiegirl1035]

And I'll remind people that there were original positive comments on SLP's "hero" in Wisconsin, to which I replied-

We are so absurdly ecstatic right now that we are not thinking clearly, IMO. Looking through the rose colored glasses of euphoria. But something isn’t right. Was this an internet connection with a man/savior. Who is it that multiple people may be charged? How does that work... (post 422, #2).

I am not sure if my post 416 (this thread) was seen as sympathetic to BR, but the quote/comments to my post make it appear to be taken that way. Regarding the replies- I am completely aware of what BR has done, and I don't need to be reminded with a list his depraved wrongdoings. I am not remotely sympathetic to BR.

But I can admit that in this case, I don't think we know the specifics of the charges involving intent. Is the charge related to the video request or actual physical rape? It could be either or both. Is this allowed to be considered or are you sympathetic if you discuss it? Is there one grade of bad? Would SLP still be getting raped? I care only in how this affects SLP, and obviously hope she wasn't betrayed beyond what we know.

"They saved her"

I share your Insight and frustration, and it could be possibly compared to people who talk about abuse as an adult. And law enforcement would say "we can't do anything until they do such or you can prove it or the perpetrator has to actually take an act for us, law enforcement, to do anything.."

I get that. But I just don't see that in this case, at all. But that is just my opinion.

But that is perhaps were everyone else who differs in opinion is coming from. That's what I like about this site, as we all have our opinions.

 

[girlhasnoname]

I've finally caught up with everything and have had a chance to think this whole situation over for a bit.

My thoughts and these are mine alone:

1. BR is an opportunistic predator. He is the lowest of the low. Taking advantage of a sexually abused child (and she is still a child) under the guise of being her hero and protector is evil. I have no other word to describe what has happened here.

2. Any normal person, who truly wanted to help SP, would have picked her up, taken her to the hospital and called police PERIOD. No need for a video - no need for anything other than compassion and doing the right thing. He used an extremely vulnerable, depressed child for his own perverted purpose. I do not believe he had any intention of helping her. His purpose was intended for his own personal gratification.

3. RP is nothing but a rapist and the worst kind. Raping your adopted daughter is again, one of the lowest of the low. Again, a predator, and a disgusting excuse for a human being. I'm going to bet that more abuse has been going on in that house.

4. I could say lots about the parenting on both sides of the equation here but I'm not going to. I think actions speak for themselves and I am thoroughly disgusted.

5. I HATE when LE announces that a missing child has been found safe and they really weren't. LE knew SP had been raped. They knew that BR's intentions were anything but pure. SP was not safe. Yup, but she was sheltered and she was fed. How does that make her safe? I've heard this many times over and I don't understand why they even say that the victim has been found safe. Just a thing for me. I HATE IT!

6. My heart aches for SP. Her desperation, her fear, her trauma is killing me. That poor child. Her mother didn't believe her. Brutal. I'm going to leave it at that for now.

I hope that both these predators are dealt with harshly in a court of law. If others are found to be involved or negligent, I hope they get what they deserve as well.

As for SP, I hope she finds a loving and supportive network of adults who will provide the stability and compassion that she needs to heal. SP is a fighter. She managed to get out, albeit probably not quite how she thought this was going to shake out but she got out. That says a lot.

MOO

Thank you for reassuring me that I haven't lost my mind! I agree with every single word you posted.

Whether or not BR was a SA victim as a child, or if he may or may not be autistic <autistic doesn't equate to unintelligent by far> or anything else does not negate the fact that he knowingly and calculatedly coerced a minor whom he knew by contact through SM to being molested by her father, to submit herself to yet ONE MORE RAPE and record it despite her repeated objections!

According to reports he then covertly drove across country to 'save' her, took her across state lines to his home without notifying LE for weeks for what purpose if not nefarious? He manipulated, coerced, abused <of power in the least> a minor, lied to LE and broke several laws including Federal statues. They have not just randomly decided to punish SP's "Savior", he is a criminal and predator. IMO

RP, I can't even begin to respond to his actions yet it's so vile and disgusting. Two monster preyed on this young girl and I hope they pay dearly as well.

 

[girlhasnoname]

Mutual restraining orders and parenting seminar. Interesting. And thanks for finding it!

I believe that these are granted standardly in GA divorce cases. I recall this because like you, it piqued my interest.

 

[Yellow Rose]

Another article:
Man accused of exploiting girl, 14, who asked to rescue her from abusive stepdad | Daily Mail Online

 

[Yellow Rose]

Does anyone know how and when she was able to finally call the FBI? I haven't found anything covering that yet.

 

[oviedo]

I believe that these are granted standardly in GA divorce cases. I recall this because like you, it piqued my interest.

I think so as well since the documents were part of the initial filing IMO (but I do wonder if it is routine because with a restraining order in place, how do you handle visitation? I may have to check into this)

 

[Jim_M]

I'm curious about this too. I won't be able to find it, so take it with a grain of salt, but I'm sure I read that the almost-divorce was his idea, not hers.

Some wonderful WS member beat me to the divorce details Well done!

I agree with all of these statements!

We all wanted to hope that she was rescued by a good samaritan so that this horrible story could have a rainbow at the end.
Sadly, the adult who rescued her set a rotten example of how to handle this type of situation.
Let's be hopeful that there was no SA by this guy, because that may just push me over the edge.

IMO we have mostly been over the edge since seeing the CC. Anything more will be just as infuriating. Thankful SP is in better (safe) hands! So so thankful she made it out of her situation. Nightmare might be the better word there.

I've finally caught up with everything and have had a chance to think this whole situation over for a bit.

My thoughts and these are mine alone:

1. BR is an opportunistic predator. He is the lowest of the low. Taking advantage of a sexually abused child (and she is still a child) under the guise of being her hero and protector is evil. I have no other word to describe what has happened here.

2. Any normal person, who truly wanted to help SP, would have picked her up, taken her to the hospital and called police PERIOD. No need for a video - no need for anything other than compassion and doing the right thing. He used an extremely vulnerable, depressed child for his own perverted purpose. I do not believe he had any intention of helping her. His purpose was intended for his own personal gratification.

3. RP is nothing but a rapist and the worst kind. Raping your adopted daughter is again, one of the lowest of the low. Again, a predator, and a disgusting excuse for a human being. I'm going to bet that more abuse has been going on in that house.

4. I could say lots about the parenting on both sides of the equation here but I'm not going to. I think actions speak for themselves and I am thoroughly disgusted.

5. I HATE when LE announces that a missing child has been found safe and they really weren't. LE knew SP had been raped. They knew that BR's intentions were anything but pure. SP was not safe. Yup, but she was sheltered and she was fed. How does that make her safe? I've heard this many times over and I don't understand why they even say that the victim has been found safe. Just a thing for me. I HATE IT!

6. My heart aches for SP. Her desperation, her fear, her trauma is killing me. That poor child. Her mother didn't believe her. Brutal. I'm going to leave it at that for now.

I hope that both these predators are dealt with harshly in a court of law. If others are found to be involved or negligent, I hope they get what they deserve as well.

As for SP, I hope she finds a loving and supportive network of adults who will provide the stability and compassion that she needs to heal. SP is a fighter. She managed to get out, albeit probably not quite how she thought this was going to shake out but she got out. That says a lot.

MOO

Your every word, every thought, puts a lump in my throat. Thank you

 

[zencompass]

[

Not enough information . . .

Dear OhThatVictoria,

This is how I am looking at this because we genuinely don't have enough information.

The Grand Jury is set to convene on February 20th.

Wisconsin Legislature: 968.40

 

[oviedo]

[

Dear OhThatVictoria,

This is how I am looking at this because we genuinely don't have enough information.

The Grand Jury is set to convene on February 20th.

Wisconsin Legislature: 968.40

He is charged with a federal offense so is this a federal grand jury?
Dane County Sheriff's Office

 

[Rosiebones]

If there was no video, and if BDR had driven all the way down from Wisconsin based the plea from SP to save her, and if he had picked her up and taken her to the hospital and LE had been alerted, her mother and father would have said respectively "I didn't know this was going on" and "It never happened" She would have been sent home with them to an even more desperate situation. Her word would not have been enough because she would have been considered "an emotional teenager, mad at her parents for moving her from her friends and school. And, even if they believed her in some way, she would have been removed and her sisters would still have been there with a mother who did not believe her when she said what had been happening.

 

[zencompass]

He is charged with a federal offense so is this a federal grand jury?
Dane County Sheriff's Office

Dear oviedo,

This Grand Jury will hear evidence pertaining to B.R.'s federal offense.

From link (below):

"The Grand Jury performs an important function under our Constitution - "Panel of the People", which stems from English common law and traces to the Magna Carta in 1215. It is the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution that mandates no person may be required to stand trial in Federal Court on a felony offense charge until an indictment is returned by a Grand Jury, unless that right is waived."

Grand Jury | Eastern District of Wisconsin | United States District Court

 

[oviedo]

I believe that these are granted standardly in GA divorce cases. I recall this because like you, it piqued my interest.

You and your spouse must be separated prior to the divorce; this can mean separate living arrangements, living in separate rooms in the same domicile or a non-sexual relationship
Georgia Divorce Process Explained Step By Step - eDivorce
GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE
The State of Georgia recognizes the following bases for a divorce:

• Marriage between close blood relatives
• Mental incompetence at the time of marriage
• Impotency
• Force, duress or fraud in securing the marriage
• Hidden pregnancy by a man other than the husband at the time of marriage
• Adultery
• Desertion for at least one year
• Felony conviction
• Habitual intoxication or drug addiction
• Emotional, physical or psychological cruelty
• Mental illness
• Irretrievably broken marriage, i.e. no fault [Based on Georgia Code – Section: 19-5-3]

the way I read their court docket for the divorce- the Plaintiff's attorney filed the dismissal but the wife never even filed an Answer - those usually wash out here but apparently GA allows the case to linger - something must have gone on IMO otherwise he could have moved for entry of final judgment when she failed to respond within 30 days of being served. HMM wonder what went on??

 

[oviedo]

Dear oviedo,

This Grand Jury will hear evidence pertaining to B.R.'s federal offense.

From link (below):

"The Grand Jury performs an important function under our Constitution - "Panel of the People", which stems from English common law and traces to the Magna Carta in 1215. It is the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution that mandates no person may be required to stand trial in Federal Court on a felony offense charge until an indictment is returned by a Grand Jury, unless that right is waived."

Grand Jury | Eastern District of Wisconsin | United States District Court

Thank you - that is what I thought - the link to Wisconsin threw me upthread.

 

[Butterfly_Rises]

IMO true justice would involve one more arrest.

I couldn't agree more.

 

[Cyber sleuth]

the way I read their court docket for the divorce- the Plaintiff's attorney filed the dismissal but the wife never even filed an Answer - those usually wash out here but apparently GA allows the case to linger - something must have gone on IMO otherwise he could have moved for entry of final judgment when she failed to respond within 30 days of being served. HMM wonder what went on??[/QUOTE]

suppose to be a quote from thread

 

[Cyber sleuth]

In discussing the divorce files in GA by RP. It could have been a plot to scare CP and keep him under his thumb. It could have done the trick and then the divorce was left lingering.
It could have also been abandoned for other various reasons: new pregnancy or birth of new child.