I'm sorry if this thought has been posted before, as I have only skimmed most posts, but something struck me as idk, an oxymoron of sorts...
When Tony gave his statement this evening, when the jury was out, and the DT desperately wanted him to say that GA had sexually abused ICA, how would that jive with the DT's opening statement that ICA had hidden the "accidental drowning" just like she had hidden everything that had to do with the sexual abuse by GA? If anything, that blows the DT's statement out the door, because if ICA had admitted to people that GA had sexually abused her, then why not admit to those same people she trusted so much as to admit having her father's P**** in her mouth @ 13, that her daughter had drowned and seeking advice or help from them?
I hope what I'm saying makes sense, because I think, even if they could find someone to go along with ICA's sick lies and say that ICA had told them about the abuse by GA, then the jurors could ultimately question why she would keep the accident a secret.
Good catch! If it's such a terrible secret that she represses everything to do with it, how come she's unloading on the new boyfriend, of all people..