Why hasn't the DT put on any rebuttal witnessess? Are they going to start from day 1 and rebutt the states case that way using god knows what and who?
TIA
Why hasn't the DT put on any rebuttal witnessess? Are they going to start from day 1 and rebutt the states case that way using god knows what and who?
TIA
I think the DT will call Cindy, George, Lee and RIP THEM TO SHREDS on the stand.
This will be KC's last acts of sadistic revenge to do as George said "destroy the whole family."
If she's going down, she's taking all of them down with her, because she's a 'spiteful b*tch'!
I'm leaning more towards the 17th as the day the state wraps up its case in chief. They still have a slew of witnesses to call including the botanist, Robyn Adams (who has been transferred from state custody to OCSO custody), the AT&T cell ping guy, Dominic Casey, and the tattoo guy.
As for her behavior on the last day of the SA's case in chief - who knows? She might ATTEMPT to look sad, but it won't last long because the DT's turn is next. I know we will see tons of smirks and contemptuous stares during that portion of the trial...:twocents:
Any one ponder if the SA closes on the 17th that that will be day 31??????? That hopefully shouldn't be lost on some people...........:twocents:
Think about it 31 days Caylee missing....SA 31 days to present....
I am new to this case, but catching up like crazy. Why is the state calling tattoo guy? I think he is more helpful to the defense. I watched a program, not sure which one, where he states ICA was an excellent mother. Very attentive. (ICA must have more than 1 for him to know Caylee?)Is this the same tattoo guy? Also, defense can say bella vita was for Caylee. A remembrance of her beautiful life, now that she is admitting that she was dead on that day she got it, not ICA's upcoming beautiful life. I hope these two perspectives cancel each other out. It is very common for grief stricken people to get remembrance tattoos. Confused on this issue, can't you tell?
I am new to this case, but catching up like crazy. Why is the state calling tattoo guy? I think he is more helpful to the defense. I watched a program, not sure which one, where he states ICA was an excellent mother. Very attentive. (ICA must have more than 1 for him to know Caylee?)Is this the same tattoo guy? Also, defense can say bella vita was for Caylee. A remembrance of her beautiful life, now that she is admitting that she was dead on that day she got it, not ICA's upcoming beautiful life. I hope these two perspectives cancel each other out. It is very common for grief stricken people to get remembrance tattoos. Confused on this issue, can't you tell?
The transcript of his interview with OCSO reflects that she was acting "normally" on June 15th as well as her subsequent visit. BTW, he is listed as a state's witness, but I didn't find his name on the defense's list. The SA may decide not to call him at all. :twocents:
Can you tell me where to find the current witness lists? I'd be grateful, as I've had no luck finding one.
You just know that GA and CA must HATE Baez - they probably think he's brainwashed their daughter to say all the horrible things she has about them.
I agree. I'm not for the death penalty. I want to watch her grow old and weary of all she has committed. I want to see her lose her youth and what she thinks is her "beauty" all behind bars. That's so much better than putting her out of her misery with death.
Wasn't sure where to put this but it is trial analysis...
JB and the DT are obviously on a low end budget...and possibly...acting more like that than they really are...
Easel
Pictures
As opposed to the states high tech presentation....
I haven't been too worried about a conviction up until this morning...as I was sitting here thinking about it....if we have some jurors that have an issue with big government spending and feeling for the little guy that can't afford anything...
Does that make sense?
What do you all think...
Is the SA is coming off as very sophisticated and high tech...or just big government with lots of money?
Is the DT coming off as a bumbling lot of clowns that need to go back to school ...or...is the jury going to feel for them because they had limited funds?
The transcript of his interview with OCSO reflects that she was acting "normally" on June 15th as well as her subsequent visit. BTW, he is listed as a state's witness, but I didn't find his name on the defense's list. The SA may decide not to call him at all. :twocents: