Idk. Maybe she's trying to be coy with the gentlemen on the jury :banghead:
COY is the exact word I would use too.
Idk. Maybe she's trying to be coy with the gentlemen on the jury :banghead:
Kwym..I'm getting sleeeeeeepy
I have a question.
How does any of this help JA at all?
She still killed Travis - violently and viciously, claiming self-defense despite substantial evidence indicating premeditation. So she can't remember. She's either malingering or not. So what?
She committed premeditated murder.
I don't see the relevance of all this - not yet, anyway.
Another question - did Dr. Samuels indicate how selective the amnesia is relating to 'criminal amnesia'? Especially when it only occurs within a defendant for the few specific acts/events that would hurt her defense? Nothing else? How is that interpreted, I wonder. Malingering comes to mind...
Still, none of this changes what she did and how she planned it.
Why is this guy relying on "articles"...isn't that like third person testimony? Can't he just speak for himself?
I think the DT's choice and use of this expert is deliberate. They didn't obtain the services of the professionalsyou cite above (or psychiatric specialists, etc.) because they would have gotten answers that would likely help the prosecution, not the defense.
This has not been proven by science. It's a cop-out. That's all.
Arias asked to see the crime scene photos and wanted to take a trip to Travis' house after the murder. Pray tell, Mr expert, is this characteristic of PSTD?
So, even if she doesn't remember it, a shooting, 28 stab wounds and a slit throat is not self defense. What does Arizona do? The pink needle or the toasty chair?
I wonder why Nurmi is constantly glancing over at Juan Martinez?