GetSmart
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2006
- Messages
- 2,312
- Reaction score
- 9
It's ALWAYS lunchtime in the JA trial! Didn't you know that? :seeya:
I think we should rename this as to "The Out Lunch Bunch / Out To Lunch Trail
It's ALWAYS lunchtime in the JA trial! Didn't you know that? :seeya:
Thank you. The video didn't match the sound of the voices. I also tried. Wptv.com and azcental, arizonafamily, and abc15. Wow I am bummed!!
Ethical custody evaluators do not write letters on behalf of ONE party without meeting with both parents. They shouldn't view or read any material provided by anyone other than the courts. They shouldn't get involved in any manner other than doing the evaluation. Testing has to be done on both parents before rendering any opinion. If the mother refused to come in, then this "doctor" should have notified the court and the judge would have made an order for her to come in.
It's not fair to assume the mother who made a complaint, has any personality disorder. Especially, since this guy was sanctioned for his actions. It's not fair to the mother to say this "doctor" made a good evaluation of the father, since the doctor was compensated for his opinion.
JMO
jodi the killer just shakin' her head in disgust at Juan
I kind of hope now that PTSD can cause memory loss so that in the event that she is acquitted my hippocampus will shrink and I won't remember this case!
Lunch break. 1.5 hours
Well good for Jodi. She suffers from dissociative amnesia. When she is sentenced to death by lethal injection she won't know why. Too bad!
Ethical custody evaluators do not write letters on behalf of ONE party without meeting with both parents. They shouldn't view or read any material provided by anyone other than the courts. They shouldn't get involved in any manner other than doing the evaluation. Testing has to be done on both parents before rendering any opinion. If the mother refused to come in, then this "doctor" should have notified the court and the judge would have made an order for her to come in.
It's not fair to assume the mother who made a complaint, has any personality disorder. Especially, since this guy was sanctioned for his actions. It's not fair to the mother to say this "doctor" made a good evaluation of the father, since the doctor was compensated for his opinion.
JMO
Wonder who she pissed at. I'm leaning towards nurmi and :floorlaugh:wilma?
Hi babycat, hope you feel better soon.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Really, would we expect anything more from an expert or witness in this defense case? I mean, REALLY???
Cmon Judge. Develop a little bit of the Judge Judy no-nonsense attitude. This is a death penalty trial!
Ethical custody evaluators do not write letters on behalf of ONE party without meeting with both parents. They shouldn't view or read any material provided by anyone other than the courts. They shouldn't get involved in any manner other than doing the evaluation. Testing has to be done on both parents before rendering any opinion. If the mother refused to come in, then this "doctor" should have notified the court and the judge would have made an order for her to come in.
It's not fair to assume the mother who made a complaint, has any personality disorder. Especially, since this guy was sanctioned for his actions. It's not fair to the mother to say this "doctor" made a good evaluation of the father, since the doctor was compensated for his opinion.
JMO