KathrynL
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2010
- Messages
- 1,475
- Reaction score
- 3,032
Thanks was just not enough. ITA with the ethical stench here. I think your assessment is exactly right on what they are doing and how they came to do it. Thanks for all you contribute to the discussion.
:rocker:
:rocker:
You know, to be fair, she's okay. In fact, she's pretty good. She just has a really horrible case.
But, she does get on my nerves personally because I can't stand her client and I am disgusted by what these defense attorneys are trying to do.
It's dishonest. They know jodi premeditated the killing of Travis. They know Travis did not abuse her and that he wasn't a pedophile. And they are not just letting their client tell a narrative. They helped her create this story. They went to the jail with Samuels and basically told her that her story wasn't working and likely gave her options to choose from as to a new story that would work better. I think that's very wrong.
Every time she repeats this garbage about Travis being a pedophile or an abuser, she is perpetrating a lie. And further victimizing the victim and his family.
So when she feigns outrage over Juan Martinez's objections or line of questioning, and when she acts like everything her witness says is interesting news and totally believable, or tries to coach her witness, it's offensive to me. So, I don't like her or Nurmi.
But my dislike has nothing to do with their actual litigation abilities or how they dress or their grooming habits, etc., which I have seen in posts. I have actually seen very little wrong in those areas in the weeks they have been in trial (notwithstanding tight outfits, crazy socks, or junk adjustments). There's much more of substance for me to be disgusted by.