Dr DoLittle claims his hypothesis is probably correct based on analysis of crime scene photos, ancillary reports, police reports, and collateral information.
Besides his own interviews with JA and his reading of the prosecution evidence including crime scene photos it hard to see how his theory is corroborated.
He is paid to claim to say JA suffered PTSD and that she suffered amnesia which is the story JA concocted in 2010.
This is tantamount to saying I believe JAs story because that is my opinion.
How do you know your opinion is correct? ANSWER because that is my learned opinion and my opinions are correct.
How do you know JA is not lying? Because her true story was consistent did not deviate and her story comports with crime scene photos. PLUS my reading of her journals and police reports helped me to conclude that JA is telling the truth.
DoLittles whole testimony is mere blather, full of high sounding jargon, and full of circular reasoning.