the date of the conversation that you reviewed prior to coming to court . . .one you read had a date and time - I believe it did . . . take a look @ exhibit #275 . . .
5/26/08 . . . does this reflect your recollection?
honestly no
response to juror question - flight or fight syndrome - like an animal - impulse to flee - if animal cannot get away there is an instinct to fight . . . . as soon as fite is over the vanquish is gone - that ends the encounter . . yes the winner doesn't stick around and do other things to the other animal . . . . typically not
they are done they go away - they don't stick around don't take advantage of the dead carcass - some animals do consume the carcass . . . .
in hypothetical once the winner is established they don't stick around - they take off -
finding of PTSD - findings of elements, scoring of the PDS, and the Milan test - could it be that you looked @those results - it appears that you are not objective anymore it colors your opinion
psychologist are trained in empathy - capacity to enter the mind of the individual - it not necessarily compassion - although Webster might disagree . . . . we are trained to be neutral observers in evaluation or doing psychotherapy not to over identify with the client - crucial training.
i have been accused of being a compassionate person . . .
you felt sorry for defendant
i don't remember sorry
semantics . . . not in the context you are using it now
compassion - you introduced word . . . that is true - compassion entered you evaluation . . .no empathy entered . . . . . we are trained to be empathetic . . .. therapeutic and evaluative
trained to have empathy for those we are assessing . . . .empathic listenings - use empathy as a tool for evaluative or therapeutic purposes . . . .part of the training - yes . . . isn't good record keeping as valuable? . . . exhibit #544 . . . part of training you are accurate on the subsections of the report . . . . accurate . . .
yes I omitted some things but it is accurate
I did score it accurately . . . . .useful for my test - the numbers 15, 16, 17 . . . . i didn't use those numbers . . . . . wasn't necessary for diagnosis . . . those numbers were not critical if they were I would have re-calculated them numerous times
empathy, training,recording, 35 years in how to keep reports and records straight - you were not accurate were you
a typographical error is not \
just like 35 years training, compassion . . .evaluative - you lost your compassion
absolutely NOT . . . absolutely not!
one more question from the jury - counsel please approach