newsjunkie
Not to be confused with A_News_Junkie
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Messages
- 1,973
- Reaction score
- 936
In my ideal world "experts" woudl be hired and administered by the courts so they would have no idea which side they were working for. They'd be given a list of objectives & questions (with some dummy ones thrown in so as not to tip the hat on which side wanted them) and their opinions would be binding.
Attorneys to risk dis-barment if they tell their client which witness is supposed to be on their side or anything like that. So, you know, Jodi wouldn't know who to tell what lie to.
Attorneys have zero personal contact wiht the witnesses, written only.
I'd love to see how some of these case turned out if the witnesses were being paid by the court.
Just an idea/dream
Exactly! Since when does a fair trial = lying and/or manipulating the facts. Their objective should be to simply evaluate not try to help someone beat the charges.