Poor JA doesn't look as happy now that Juror 5 is there. She is sitting behind JA's family
she's a dismissed juror and so now just an AZ citizen with every right to attend a public proceeding. She's not going to have access to the jury and she's said she won't discuss the case even though she could. She's made a personal investment and if she feels she wants to watch for whatever reason in public and hold her head high that's her right. I've felt she likely did nothing wrong and the judge once again just acted to appease the defense. Her showing up makes me more certain of the DT making much of nothing. She is not required to hide her head in shame at home because of the antics of these defense attorneys. Maybe she won't even come again. But she has the same right anyone else does to attend the trial.
I don't like that she is sitting on the defense side of the room.
I have history of abuse too including being diagnosed w/ PTSD afterwards. See some of my earlier posts about it if you would like to.
ALV does not represent me or anyone else I know who has been abused.
Let's see what she does for "the cause" on cross.
My guess - we will redefine the roles of abuse on a very public scale.
No, she doesn't.
I think she has peanut butter stuck to the roof of her mouth. She keeps doing something weird with her tongue
She already stated that she would not be speaking to anyone until after the trial. She has rights.
I don't agree, she has every right to be there just like KCL, KDDJ, etc has a right to be there. Her privacy can still be respected, she doesn't need to talk. She had her life flipped upside down for the past two months...more power to her if she wants to attend.
Apparently JA forgot a picture at his house per JA. :what:Juror question:
What were JA's deeds that made
TA say those things?