Schuby
Under the thumb of The Man
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2013
- Messages
- 3,563
- Reaction score
- 3
ooppps...double post. Need more coffee it appears
Yes, they can ask Q's of rebuttal witnesses.
ooppps...double post. Need more coffee it appears
Yes, they can ask Q's of rebuttal witnesses.
Never mind... Found it!
Court resumes 9:30 Friday 4/12.
Hello all!
It's a great day for Travis. I loved the questions! I loved how the jurors have turned the tables on the Defense team by asking repeatedly about JA as liar, perpetrator, manipulator etc. And a couple of questions were a sort of personal FU to ALV. I think some of the jurors dislike her almost as much as JM does. You don't ask about what/where an expert witness is looking at unless you do not give her the benefit of the doubt. I was pleasantly shocked at that question. And the hidden messages! It's like some jurors feel that ALV and JA are accomplices in trying to dupe the world about the premeditated murder!
I'm so confident. I feel like skipping and singing today as I can feel Justice getting soooo close. :skip:
It drove me crazy how she kept saying that Travis, as a child of abuse wouldn't be able to form healthy relationships unless there is some kind of intervention. THERE WAS AN INERVENTION, and at a relatively young age at that.
Me too. And didn't ALV state that intervention should come between the ages of 2-10 or something along those lines?
Helllloooo...she didn't even know? She testified that TA kept JA a secret by making JA leave his grandmother's house before she woke up.
Sounds to me, just like with RS, she fit the evidence to match the description needed. DV involves 2 people, she should have gathered much information on TA and his life as well. And not just from the defendant.
K
How did Bobby die?
I like bacon.
OBJECTION! Beyond the scope.
Over-ruled. Mmmm...bacon.
.
.
.
.
.
LAV is very biased toward JA. She showed her belligerence just like JA when she told JM she would put him in time out. I seriously doubt any juror is going to think it is "ok" for teenagers to lie, hit and kick your parents. Those things alone would be enough for me to just disregard this witness.
Yeah, how pathetic of the defense team to not provide her with the journal entries form June 10th and onward. I'm certain that much of the bad stuff about Jodi has been filtered out by Willmot and Nurmi. This bad stuff would have shown to her how deceptive, crafty and manipulative Jodi is. Someone who can NOT be trusted unless there is a HD video to back up her side of the story.
Juan has a golden opportunity to butcher her on cross examine. I was very disappointed that he did not bring this up during his first cross, but now he has another shot. He can't blow it this time. Her post-June 4th journal entries challenge the credibility of the entire journal, especially the entries from May 26th to June 1st. All part of her coverup.
To add to that, the jury has heard testimony that her parents had to take the 'wires' out of the car to keep her at home, not going to school, dropping out of school, moving in with a boyfriend at 17 because she didn't like the rules.
They know she was a bad teen, though JA tried to testify she was innocent and being abused by her parents for trying to discipline her for unruly things.
They are not buying what ALV is selling.
Kelly
BUT, some teens are like that and go on to be very productive good citizens. Teen years are tough for some.
Jodi on the other hand is a whole different story.