Frigga
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2009
- Messages
- 5,229
- Reaction score
- 36
It is almost unbelievable the way Kirk Nurmi lounges... almost lays in his chair. Look at his head height compared to Jennifer Wilmott.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was disappointed with her. I was expecting more. IMO, Dr. DeMarte sounded like she was reciting straight out of her college texts. She gave me the impression that she used alot of her tools (tests) on her clients but I did not get the impression that she did much acutal therapy. I don't know anything about the kind of work that she has done but it sounded like she was just evaluating people to "get them through the system". CPS, prisoners, low income people, disability claims. :moo:
Watching the last segment of Juan's rebuttal with Dr.D. ... This expert is incredibly educated, articulate, knowledgeable, and moves as fast as Juan without skipping a beat. She never stutters or stumbles and she answers every question with precision and accuracy. She is awesome! To be able to answer questions in a context (this trial) with such fluidity is amazing! She's a perfect match for Juan because she can move as fast as he does but with clear, concise explanations for the jury! True anti-thesis of the previous "experts."
This is my first trial here, so please forgive me if this is something every one else knows. What are the attorneys sliding back and forth on the ledge at the Judge's desk when they are having sidebars? They seem to be moving it in front of themselves as they speak.
This is my first trial here, so please forgive me if this is something every one else knows. What are the attorneys sliding back and forth on the ledge at the Judge's desk when they are having sidebars? They seem to be moving it in front of themselves as they speak.
I was disappointed with her. I was expecting more. IMO, Dr. DeMarte sounded like she was reciting straight out of her college texts. She gave me the impression that she used alot of her tools (tests) on her clients but I did not get the impression that she did much acutal therapy. I don't know anything about the kind of work that she has done but it sounded like she was just evaluating people to "get them through the system". CPS, prisoners, low income people, disability claims. :moo:
Gosh, and MOO, but she LOOKS an awful lot like JA. In a prettier, less creepy way.....but facial features, coloring...... Yeah.
:seeya: GAMom13! I saw someone here at WS post that it's some kind of white noise maker... keeps them from being overheard by others in the courtroom.
I could be wrong, but I think I have heard Dr Drew refer to himself as an Internist. He's not a Psychologist or a Psychiatrist.
:seeya: GAMom13! I saw someone here at WS post that it's some kind of white noise maker... keeps them from being overheard by others in the courtroom.
One thing JA's lawyers couldn't hide today was their fascination with what DD was saying in the courtroom in regards to Jodi's 'issues' ... they've been dealing with her for years, they've suffered and continued to suffer, she's one of the most difficult people I've ever seen a DT try and save, sure she behaves herself for the most part in court, but she's broken every single rule of someone on trial, and it still goes on and on. She talked and talked and talked to the police, she went on the media, she lied to the people who were sent in to test her, she lied on the stand and got snippy with the prosecutor .. she's been IMPOSSIBLE!
The defence strategy for this trial is truly HORRIBLE, absolutely disgraceful.
They could have had an interesting defence using her BPD all the way through, no doubt she didn't allow it because she was loath to admit it. So here they are struggling for witnesses to agree with her version of events, it couldn't have been easy.
You gotta feel a little bit sorry for Wilmott and Nurmi. Not a lot, but a little.