THANK YOU!!
I laughed so hard reading that and bookmarked it so I can check it daily. What an amazing writer and BANG ON! Lol.
I am still on the fence about the camera. I think she was all in a panic. Things hadn't gone according to plan, there was this huge mess. She is cut, bleeding, there is DNA to be concerned with. She was so superior that she really did not plan for the cleanup involved in a non shower contained death. I think she could have in her panic simply mistakenly dropped the camera in.
Or maybe, she was concerned that people would instantly know it was missing from the scene and think photography - Jodi.
If the camera was purposefully put in the washer I feel it had her blood on it.
Jesus all the nuts are crawling out of the wood work lately.
Hoping he doesn't actually have anything on him
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
I must admit it was much easier to listen to him questioning witnesses than JW's high pitched voice and sarcasm especially directed toward Dr. DeMarte.
:truce:
MOO
I think the juror was saying the Bear (Travis suffered horrific trauma) and if the Tiger (JA) has trauma it is because of the trauma she put Travis through and it was after the fact and not because of so called abuse.
This comports precisely with the defendant's version of events which she recounted for the jury in answer to a juror's question; i.e., "I have no memory of putting the camera in the washer."
Which is precisely why I don't believe it for a second.
My understanding was that the sheets had been washed and were in the drier. I don't think that was something that was done prior to the murder not after the murder. The camera was in the washer with clothes & towels. I could be wrong but that is how I understood it.
There was brown(?) Bedsheets and pillow cases
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
TA's wallet was in his office.
I have a question: Can the DT call Jodi on rebuttal? JW and JA seem to be gearing up for something, writing lots and lots of notes, so I am wondering, Are these notes to requestion JA at some point? Why else would they be writing all these notes?
But, but HE didn't pull it off if you ask me. The lack of intelligent thinkers did! He clearly got the ultimate LUCKY!
I have to say I really like that jurors can ask questions in AZ. Most of them seem to give a read on what they are thinking.
FL need to add this to their sunshine laws.
In the CA case, then we could have seen that, "When does the dessert lady come again?" Would not have left us as dumbfounded
!I'm not joking about that. It is the TRUTH!
This comports precisely with the defendant's version of events which she recounted for the jury in answer to a juror's question; i.e., "I have no memory of putting the camera in the washer."
Which is precisely why I don't believe it for a second.
In the most simplistic way I can think of putting this:Then I don't think your fear would qualify as PTSD - more like fear of all animals, or all wild animals, or something like that. At any rate, you wouldn't be responding to the specific animal that caused your fear.
IIRC, Jodi said on (Samuels') test, that the incident was cuased by a stranger so it follows that she should experience PTSD when she is among strangers. Travis was hardly a stranger.
It wasn't. Towel (matching the one on his towel bar in the photos ... rust/orange color/salmon (lol)), t-shirt, socks, camera, etc. NO bedding.