cubbeegirl
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2010
- Messages
- 2,306
- Reaction score
- 9
Who is this Linda Ballard who Travis was supposedly going to marry?
The girl he bought the engagement ring for that Jodi allegedly stole.
Who is this Linda Ballard who Travis was supposedly going to marry?
well we cant have it both ways
he's going to discredit the testing DD did and will affirm that Alyce was right because both of them have that super special ability to know when someone is an abuser even though they never even talk to them. He does this for money-the first case I read he testified the father was an abuser-the court entirely discredited his testimony, called him a hired gun and awarded full custody to the father, along with attorney fees.
He's also an anti DP advocate apparently and has produced affidavits and testimony for DP convicts that says they have some mentel illness and so they shouldn't be executed and he has been criticized by the court for having no independent verification of the facts of the case as he only spoke to the defendats attorney.
He is also an actual psychologist, just like Samuels. have no idea how the judge is allowing this new guy. They had every chance for 5 years or so to pick their expert-they did and he testified. Now they want a redo at the last minute. I really don't get how or why this was permitted. Samuels could easily be recalled to counter DD-he and the new guy have the exact same credentials.
IMO she's worse than Manson. He never personally killed anyone....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IMO she's worse than Manson. He never personally killed anyone....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BBM Can anyone understand what Wilmott said after she said "It's good" twice?
Relax..... :therethere:
only because the brain was "like pudding"...the bullet left no actual track...but...using "simple geometry " we know how the bullet traversed. JC is just saying that out of 5 million evidence points, the DT scored 1 point for lack of visable brain damage
No. Big. Deal.
:cow:
Yeah, I'd put her more in the category of other "eraser killers" like Scott and Drew Peterson. Or Miss Anthony (although JA outstrips her on several levels, one of which is that her lies seem much less ADD Impromptu and more deliberate Machievellian in scope. She also had the whole follow-through after-the-fact thing wrapped up much better.
The trajectory of the bullet is from an unusual position, I originally thought Travis must have been lying on the ground after the neck wound when she shot him, but the angle is wrong, unless she stood above him and the bullet's trajectory changed as it hit bone, can that happen with a .25 to that degree, as in a near straight in shot from above, then ricochets to the right as it hits the skull, then again as it goes through the skull into the cheek?
Let us know when the unveiling will be AND make sure it is after 5PM so I can drink my wine and read all about it!:seeya:I've put a padlock on my brain until the verdict is reached. But after that I will have some stories....we'll have to have another Saturday night story hour. lol
Exactly. My point has nothing to do with Travis being a murder victim, and everything to do with the media, and the social media, turning themselves inside out to excuse, minimize or rationalize behaviour (sexual or moral) that, in a woman, is outright condemned.
Well, I don't know who this Linda Ballard Boss is unless she was a high school sweetheart Never heard of her before.
Have the Jury not seen the autopsy photos yet?
They only need one juror to have "doubt" so why not? And they don't have to pay for it.... but I am betting Juan makes him wish he never heard of JA.... IMOOWhy, oh why, do the DT think this "expert" will be at all credible given his history and ALV involvement???