If Reeva was killed in the early morning hours of Feb 14, then the text about her consoling OP and cooking him dinner was on Feb 13.
I can't find that text, or any from today's trial, yet but I seem to recall that Reeva said something about OP needing and/or wanting to be consoled by friends and family.
If something was already wrong with OP, to the point that Reeva was concerned about not only herself but others consoling OP then it makes it easier to see that an argument later on would have pushed him over the edge, IMO.
Even in the "normal and loving" texts it still seems that Reeva was walking on eggshells with OP. Asking him if it was ok for her to wear a specific dress? Not normal unless she knew that if she wore the wrong thing it would set him off. The saying that she had plans with a friend (ex?), but could do it another day? Again not normal unless she knew that it could set him off. It makes no sense that she appears to always need his permission in not only what she wears but what she does, who she sees and what she cooks.
I still believe that the defense and OP have a hard uphill battle after the State has presented their case. To many things that they (OP) will have to try and explain away. It is also going to be very important for OP to take the stand and stick to his story. Whichever one he decides to finally go with, he needs to stick with it. The female screams intermixed with male voice is going to have to be explained. If the defense continues with the first shot hitting Reeva in the head, then the judge may look at the rest of their case as hot air and smoke blown to cause confusion.
MOO