This is crucial testimony from the ex gf because Reevas night Bag and Slippers were found on the LEFT side of the bed clearly indicating that she slept on the left side of the bed. The holster of the gun was found under the left side of the bed. This means she was sleeping on this side facing the balcony, now if she really woke up so close to the balcony she would have definitely seen him or heard him in the baloney trying to move in the big brand new fan into the bedroom, however Roux claims due to his shoulder injury, that night he slept on the beds left side. Reevas personal belongings found on the left side of the bed exposes this lie once again.
After he claims to have heard a sound from the bathroom, he had to remove the gun from the holster found under the left side side of the bed, in doing this his face and eyes would have had to be not more than one foot from where Reeva was sleeping, how did he not notice that she wasn't in the bed or try to wake her up and warn her of an intruder in his home?
Of course, OP would claim he was taking her to the car to transport her to the hospital, since he said he was instructed to by Netcare.
Update: Outside the Court, Barry Roux was overheard to say to reporters:
"Please step aside, me and Oldwage have to get in my car and shoot some robots."
I think the second set of sounds were the gunshots.
After this, no more woman screaming.
Oscar yells out "help,help,help."
OP told Barber "everything was fine".
He was staring at OP
'I got such a terrible fright when OP had told me everything was fine,only to get there and find him carrying Reeva down the stairs'
That is very damning, that HE INITIALLY SAID 'EVERYTHING IS FINE.'
Wouldnt he have said HELP< CALL AN AMBULANCE!!!!!
No, he said it's fine. That is a problem for Roux. Wonder how he is going to handle this.
An accidental firearm discharge one night in Silverwood, quickly forgotten? And a missing person thread for Reeva here on WS?
Thanks canny. I suspect he will change his mind, unless he's confident that he can put forward a reasonable explanation for killing Reeva, and explain why he told the security guard everything was 'fine' after he'd just shot dead the 'love of his life', or explain why he was able to alert Samantha Taylor to a potential intruder (and managed not to shoot her dead) while not being capable of alerting Reeva in the same situation, and did shoot her dead, while not once bothering to find out where she was. Lots of holes to fill.
Wait a minute. He's already dating another woman? And who on earth would date a man that had killed his previous girlfriend?
Originally Posted by zwiebel
SAm 'He could walk on his stumps but often balanced himself on something. He had difficulty balancing on his stumps.'
This is interesting.
Was he balancing himself with the cricket bat?
What do you think ?
A - They will fight on.
B - The forensic, ballistic and post-mortem reports will pull their butt out of the fire.
C - They will prepare a *plea bargain*.
.
.
The foundation of the OP's defense team case is the Reeva never screamed at all,she took four bullets in pin drop silence and all the witnesses are mistaking Oscar's screaming as Reeva's .This is the only way they can explain away OP shooting four shots through the door and killing her. How they will be able to convince and win over milady with this ridiculous argument is beyond comprehension.Tomorrow if a witness testifies that he heard OP's two nasty looking guard dogs barking, Roux will contend that when Oscar is hurting he can bark just like his two dogs.
Wait a minute. He's already dating another woman? And who on earth would date a man that had killed his previous girlfriend?
Have you seen the pics of his current gf?
Seems he likes them young.
I can imagine why he was so insecure around Reeva. Here was a beautiful, elegant, WOMAN around his own age.
bbm
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
So now he needs to sound like fearful woman, a man, and a dog at the same time.
Good luck!!
Exactly IMO too, the second round of bangs were the gunshots that killed Reeva, the last one being the head shot from which she had no hope of recovery.
The pros know this and I expect we will see further evidence up the line to prove it. Roux seems to think he can push OP's affidavit as gospel to the witnesses and every answer they give must support it all costs up to the point of badgering and bullying. OP's version is already falling apart at the seams and being exposed as a contrived pack of lies.