I just want all of you babas to know that I love you....
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
:floorlaugh:
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
I just want all of you babas to know that I love you....
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
:floorlaugh:
Pieter Baba mentioned triggering the alarm during his testimony. He said, if OP was that concerned why didn't he trigger the alarm. My words not his. I cannot quite remember exactly what he said but I think I posted it at the time and a link to the video where it shows him saying it.
Rebecca Davis ‏@becsplanb 54s
The line between "protective" and "controlling" often seems hard to discern. Eg "I don't want you driving alone at night"
https://twitter.com/becsplanb
I am wondering - Is it possible for Nel not to get a chance to cross examine Oscar?
I imagine Roux finishing with Oscar at the end of the week, Nel starting cross examination Monday morning and at the first big challenge Oscar breaking down and being unable to return to the stand. Roux will describe his break down and that he now needs medical care. The trial goes on without Oscar testifying further and Roux in closing asks/pleads that Milady not penalise Oscar for his inability to continue testifying. Please consider that he recounted his entire memory of the event and that he then became medically unfit to remain on the stand. Roux might give a big sob story about a ruined and broken, heartbroken man who needs care and medical help not jail and further punishment.
I forgot about that! Why wouldn't Nel have exploited that in X, I wonder?
:waitasec:
,
My Lady was quick to leave the bench when OP started moaning, very quick. She does not want to sit there and observe this spectacle. And she did not seem at all bothered to adjourn early either. So I suspect that one of two things are about to happen. She will continue to take Crybaby breaks and adjourn as needed, if OP looks overwhelmed emotionally, for as long as it takes to finish this man's trial. Or she will admonish him from the bench to compose himself. Either way this trial is not going to stop unless a doctor of medicine, a psychiatrist not a psychologist, testifies that OP needs to be hospitalized for whatever period of time.
Looks like even Roux has been made a bit emotional by today too.
Karyn Maughan ‏@karynmaughan 2m
Roux tells ballistic expert Mangena:"if the state incorrectly prosecuted an innocent young men, then you have ruined him forever" @eNCAnews
Did I hear OP give an account about how the decorators had disconnected the burglar alarm, or was it the panic alarm?
Oh yes.. OP's plan is falling into place and settling nicely. We knew he would try and mesmerize the female judge... and she seems to be taking the bait. Our only hope is cross at this point... something needs to be done here... whatever it is, I hope it works... the truth needs to emerge.
Hospitalized? For what? Bad acting?
Hahaha, when I listen to Roux and Nel, I also thought their voices are soo annoying and then realized that to foreigners, I probably sound exactly the same! :blushing:quoting myself!
When I think of things Roux might say I have his voice in my head saying it. I may come away from this trial with a SA accent for a while!
Another question for anyone with better SA legal understanding - if OP cannot manage cross exam without breaking down, sobbing and adjournments and Roux says so as above but OP is able to sit through the remaining trial would it be that his testimony isn't considered in judgement as there was no ability to cross? If so then this would be v clever of DT and good scenario for OP, IMO.
Oh yeah, Dewani... another young man who has not had the bottle to face the charges. Glad he is finally back in SA and shame on the British justice system that has allowed his histrionics to go on for so long.He is going to end up keeping Shrien Dewani company at this rate .
I said yesterday that he might never end up being cross examined
If he does come back on the stand he really needs to get a grip because he has made things worse for himself and I am not surprised he is sobbing . The thought of 25 years in jail is enough to make anyone sob and wail
JMOO
Tasha's restaurant now. Lereno(sp) the young boxer had asked for help with his diet. Also Justin and Darren.
O: ...I'd been looking at purchasing a gun similar, it was smaller than mine....I wanted to see if it had an attachment for a flashlight. I asked him to pass it to me. I was stupid. I wanted to make sure it was safe, wasn't loaded. As I checked it, a round came out of the breech. Nxt thing I knew, it went off.
I was quite angry Darren Mr Fresco had handed me an unsafe weapon. I gave it back and said 'What if someone had got hurt?'
Then Darren told the party it got hooked on his pants.....I believe we were both to blame.....he told me not to say anything.
R: Did you say anything about the media?
O: Not at that point.....I said how it would look if it got out? Did her realise the severity? Dareen kept coming up with excuses.
OP said he told the owner it was 'my fault. I'll pay for the damages'.
Isn't it a bit strange that OP says he just 'sat' there when he got to Reeva, and doesn't know how long for, and 'she wasn't breathing' - but then (presumably) quite a while later, he carries her downstairs; And only then tries to resuscitate her, when other people are present?
I think a mistrial could come into play if Nel's not afforded the opportunity to cross. I very much doubt Roux would allow that to happen though - without Oscar's testimony, he's almost guaranteed a murder conviction. (See De Oliveira) JMOquoting myself!
When I think of things Roux might say I have his voice in my head saying it. I may come away from this trial with a SA accent for a while!
Another question for anyone with better SA legal understanding - if OP cannot manage cross exam without breaking down, sobbing and adjournments and Roux says so as above but OP is able to sit through the remaining trial would it be that his testimony isn't considered in judgement as there was no ability to cross? If so then this would be v clever of DT and good scenario for OP, IMO.
Yes! And this is exactly what I am thinking all along - he goes in this type of details without any obvious reason except to match/answer (in advance) the things that go against him. Did anyone/Roux ask him for how long? No! Why mention it then!? This is exactly why his testimony often seems so fake to me. Like he knows, and is very careful, what to say and mention, and what not to mention! And this, to me, suggests that he is not telling the truth. Because, when you're telling the truth, you don't need to be so obviously careful about what you are saying, right?
Also, I am no longer very impressed with Roux's defense tactics - it just all looks too obvious to me... that OP is prepared 'to a T'... and that he has memorised the story he is now telling, instead of telling it from his memory alone.
Many things would look much more plausable if he didn't go in such detail all by himself; if Roux had to stop him and ask him, for example, 'do you remeber for how long'...
His psychologist that runs to comfort him when he breaks down, was the lady with short silver/blonde hair & glasses, that was sitting next to his sister. She broke down crying herself
O: we started dinner about 7.. After we chatted about Reeva's work. We sat at the dining table...she asked me to go through a contract she was about to sign. I made some changes for her....usuall after dinner we would watch TV but we both had a taxing day so decided to go upstairs.
While we were taking the plates, Reeva asked me if I wanted a warm drink. I said yes and went upstairs. She joined me a couple of minutes later.
Long pause.