supernovaNic
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 386
- Reaction score
- 0
One thing I picked up on is Angry Oscar doesn't whine. I hope Nel keeps him angry. Gawd that whine is annoying.
It seems so manipulative.
One thing I picked up on is Angry Oscar doesn't whine. I hope Nel keeps him angry. Gawd that whine is annoying.
On the messaging "I love you" front, addressed by Nel.
2/3 months into a relationship, there's no danger I'd say "I love you" to a partner after that short space of time, even if I felt that way.
Notably, Reeva hadn't said it to Oscar either, so unsure why Nel's unfairly picking Oscar up on it?
Hi Lisa. Why do you think she didn't make a call then and even just let it run if she couldn't speak? Cheers
Given that he has often spoken about being on a restricted diet when in training I have wondered if he might be bulimic? Could explain the ease with which he throws up when things get awkward.
I also think he was perfectly aware of avoiding writing out damaging text messages as they can ultimately come back and damage brand Oscar if an ex sold a story so he knows to use the phone when it comes to arguing instead of texting.
Thank you so much for your response!
As far as Reeva's phone, I wonder if they determined what time she stopped using any application on it. Because Oscar contends that she was looking at pictures when he was "going to sleep." He said that she was playing with her phone when he went to sleep, IIRC. And then he says that when he awoke, she was still up. So that makes me think he is suggesting that she was still "playing with her phone" when he woke up. I don't think he ever said that outright - IIRC he didn't really say what she was actually doing when he woke up, just that she said something like "can't sleep Baba?" I guess he can't claim to say he knew what she was doing b/c that would imply that he saw her for longer than he says he did (when he went to get the fans). He says he never actually looked at her, oh except today he said he saw how the duvet was placed on her. But that was his own *mistake* getting all his lies and stories mixed up.
Then there is the question of, whether or not Oscar actually went to sleep or not. And I would think his Ipad activity would be some indication as to that. For example, if there is Ipad activity after his claimed sleep time, well then just more evidence he's lying. In contrast, if there is no Ipad activity, at least we can rule out that he was on his Ipad during his supposed sleeping.
Well honestly, it's hard to say because I can't trust with certainty that it was in the locked toilet room. That is Oscar's story and I don't believe him at all.
I do believe that it was somewhere in the bathroom.
Maybe she ran in to the bathroom and was going to call for help. The Stipps described that the screams got closer. Oscar knocked it out of her hands (hence the cover being knocked off of it), she ran in to the toilet and locked the door and he shot her.
We just don't know. The only thing we do know is that Oscar refuses to tell anybody the truth. Why do people lie? To cover up the truth.
Does "one up" mean one bullet in the chamber? But he fired 4 shots?
That's what he wants everyone to believe but you cannot compare a barely 3 month relationship with father and daughter, and many, like me, have reservations with the decision not to prosecute in this case, as it sets precedents that people like OP will seek to rely on.
ETA in RV's case, that could have been someone elses son/daughter
I believe it means one bullet is always left loaded in the chamber ready to go. To fire more you'd have to do something to load from the magazine into the chamber. *advertiser censored*? slide? something.
It is funny that you should say that but his behaviour on the stand is very much like that .He has the mature gun crazy macho exterior image but a child like immature side as well.
I believe it means one bullet is always left loaded in the chamber ready to go. To fire more you'd have to do something to load from the magazine into the chamber. *advertiser censored*? slide? something.
For me, until and unless there is actual evidence put forth to discredit the 5 people who heard a woman screaming, it's still murder. If the defence can manage that, then I might start considering culpable homicide. Maybe. Perhaps. Okay, probably not, but I can try.
JMO
Thanks Lisa.
He'd had plenty girlfriends previously and one lasting about 3 years. I wonder what made him risk everything by shooting this one particular girl after only a few months?
So it can account for the gap between first shot and 3 following shots?
Thank you. Did the gun he used load automatically or did he have to manually load each bullet?