I think they made a mistake using a psychiatrist, who'd be be more likely to go for firm psychiatric diagnoses, instead of a psychologist. The latter would be more likely to delve into the vulnerability associated with a physical disability without tying themselves into diagnostic knots. Or would that simply be classified as character witness testimony and therefore not admissible?
Either way, some sort of psych defence was inevitable so why was this only happening in the last few weeks? Did someone pull out? So bizarre. There's something very odd going on in the defence camp, IMO.
Remember the early days of the trial when Roux's cross examination scored him autograph hunters and a rap song written for him? I bet he's wishing he turned the whole thing down now.
Either way, some sort of psych defence was inevitable so why was this only happening in the last few weeks? Did someone pull out? So bizarre. There's something very odd going on in the defence camp, IMO.
Remember the early days of the trial when Roux's cross examination scored him autograph hunters and a rap song written for him? I bet he's wishing he turned the whole thing down now.