Well, Chad did turn himself from a sow's ear into a silk purse, didn't he, but it didn't last for long.Seriously? How about Pryor had an "ineffective" client to work with...can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear!
Well, Chad did turn himself from a sow's ear into a silk purse, didn't he, but it didn't last for long.Seriously? How about Pryor had an "ineffective" client to work with...can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear!
Sorry about that. I had posted the link while it was live from the judge’s channel and I guess it was unavailable after the live ended or something. I’m really not sure what happened but I apologize for whatever I might have done that caused that.As you can see - the video says "private" - so do not know what that is about...
Thank you for this update. Any time for that hearing? TIA!![]()
It was a status hearing regarding the post sentencing or post trial petition filed by the defense on July 17th - new defense atty is Ian Thomson (public defender - capital cases). I haven’t seen the petition but apparently asking for new trial based on ineffectiveness of counsel but may include more than that too - I’m not sure. I didn’t know the hearing was coming up but guess I’m still subscribed to Judge B’s channel because it appeared in my YouTube feed while i was looking for something else lol.Ayo hold up a minute. Why was there a hearing today and how long have we known about it?
Here's one that should work, from Crime Talk
I don't understand the outrage. The property could have been bought by a developer and the families would have no say about its use. The new owner will consult with the victims' families. If the families wanted to have full control, they should have bought it themselves or do fundraising. (JMO)Oh no! KW is upset about someone buying the property and not consulting the families about their plan.
I can understand. It is a gruesome murder scene for three people. I doubt many murder victim's families would want to visit the place their loved one died or have other people visit it repeatedly. It would be more of a constant opening of a wound rather than a place of healing.I don't understand the outrage. The property could have been bought by a developer and the families would have no say about its use. The new owner will consult with the victims' families. If the families wanted to have full control, they should have bought it themselves or do fundraising. (JMO)
Tylee and JJ were likely murdered in Lori's (or Alex's) Rexburg apartment, yet nobody is demanding something be done (or not done) with it. Another family is probably living there. Before Chad's house was even put on the market, several people were suggesting online that the entire property should be turned into a park with a memorial to honor the victims. It didn't seem realistic to me at the time. For example, if Chad's children had the money to buy the property back, they wouldn't be asking others for their opinions.I can understand. It is a gruesome murder scene for three people. I doubt many murder victim's families would want to visit the place their loved one died or have other people visit it repeatedly. It would be more of a constant opening of a wound rather than a place of healing.