momoftwocrazies
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2014
- Messages
- 234
- Reaction score
- 367
Freaking out over here...
LOLing that Dr. D was just a quack w/ opinions with no proof up until now when he's not testifying. Now he is *the* expert on memory and doesn't want to ruin his reputation and years of experience... Sigh.
LOLing that Dr. D was just a quack w/ opinions with no proof up until now when he's not testifying. Now he is *the* expert on memory and doesn't want to ruin his reputation and years of experience... Sigh.
Based on the evidence that was presented during the trial, I think that the chance that Cooper was "forgotten" in the car is infinitesimally small. I now believe that Cooper was purposely left in the car. I will outline the evidence as well as how I arrived at my conclusion this evening.
The ultimate nail in the coffin came when reflecting on Dr. Brewer's testimony. Up until Ross missed the entrance for the turn lane, he had multiple triggers reminding him that he just had breakfast for Cooper. For instance, the CFA itself would serve as a "cue" that Ross just had breakfast with Cooper. I don't believe that it is possible to forget something at the time same time that you are staring a trigger. It doesn't add up. The short time frame in which Cooper was forgotten has always been troublesome (I do understand that it takes only a fraction of a second to forget), but the fact that Ross had constant visible triggers/cues makes it practically impossible for that to happened.
While the jury cannot weigh Dr. Diamond backing out when they deliberate, I am not a juror. It is extremely telling to me. Dr. Diamond doesn't believe that Ross forgot, and I don't either.
I have not yet listened to the final witness today so this is subject to change.
Like I said, they didn't even call the expert.
Yeah I guess this is the time to decide whether or not RH will testify…drum roll….What does everybody think? I'm thinking he just might. He looks dressed for it.
Based on the evidence that was presented during the trial, I think that the chance that Cooper was "forgotten" in the car is infinitesimally small. I now believe that Cooper was purposely left in the car. I will outline the evidence as well as how I arrived at my conclusion this evening.
The ultimate nail in the coffin came when reflecting on Dr. Brewer's testimony. Up until Ross missed the entrance for the turn lane, he had multiple triggers reminding him that he just had breakfast for Cooper. For instance, the CFA itself would serve as a "cue" that Ross just had breakfast with Cooper. I don't believe that it is possible to forget something at the time same time that you are staring a trigger. It doesn't add up. The short time frame in which Cooper was forgotten has always been troublesome (I do understand that it takes only a fraction of a second to forget), but the fact that Ross had constant visible triggers/cues makes it practically impossible for that to happened.
While the jury cannot weigh Dr. Diamond backing out when they deliberate, I am not a juror. It is extremely telling to me. Dr. Diamond doesn't believe that Ross forgot, and I don't either.
I have not yet listened to the final witness today so this is subject to change.
Okay, this guy is not making sense to me at all.
From what I know, security is a matter of the web site you are visiting. A VPN is typically used to mask one's IP address.
I understand if JRH needed a VPN to see what a web site looks like from someone else's IP. That makes sense, though I am not sure why he didn't replace the VPN he was using with another one.
However Moulton's example of a nurse logging into a hospital's web site did not make sense. She would not "need" a VPN to access a calendar or schedule events.
If she "wanted" a VPN to make sure her IP is not logged, or if she wanted to make sure how it looked on someone else's end, then that's her choice. It's not necessary though.
If you see an "https" in the address of a web site, then typically it is secure enough to browse. Of course there will always be a risk of hacking even with a VPN, but VPNs can also be hacked, and they can also keep logs of what you do through them, and they can also be under subpoena in the event you do something illegal online.
Again, I am not an expert. This is basic security stuff most people know. The actual expert should be able to explain this stuff, not me. But here I am...
Freaking out over here...
I don't subscribe to dr diamonds "theory" but I was certainly open to hearing what he had to say. It's his actual own words that he won't testify for a case he doesn't believe is actual FBS- one can assume it's because he doesn't want to ruin his reputation.
I do believe that a parent can forget a child in the car- for a lot of different reasons that don't apply to Ross. IMO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, clearly there 's more than one to be had. Dr. Brewer makes at least two. Perhaps there are more. I typed up and posted a close-enough transcript of his cross, and a summary of his direct, so those who are inclined and haven't/won't/ can't watch the hours of testimony can form an informed opinion of his efficacy.
IMO, he did what needed to be done, though I hoped for Diamond.
Back to yesterday's speculation. I wonder if Dr. Diamond's willingness to testify was contingent upon RH's willingness to take the stand. I'd imagine that would be a decision the DT would need to review towards the end of trial, to best counsel RH, so maybe a last minute but not unanticipated need to locking in a placement?
I find it difficult to believe a highly credentialled , nationally known expert witness would bail because he didn't like the way the wind is blowing.
But that was a very weak performance, imo. I don't think it was very compelling. JMO