Fantazteko
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 40
- Reaction score
- 0
I stand corrected.I can totally understand this train of thought, however if the killer was Z and this case is similar to the one you mentioned, we have to consider a few things.
Z had been to prison before for petty crimes. I would think because of this, they have a lot of information on him. We have not read that any of his previous crimes were violent in nature. But rather that his previous crimes were actually done to get him a shelter and food during the cold winters. If someone was a serial killer I would think they would avoid prison at all cost, preferring to keep their name off the radar of the law. I wouldn't think a serial killer, would commit petty crimes to put himself in jail for shelter.
Also his DNA was found under SS's finger nails. If he had done this before and multiple times, I would think at least one of two things, either he would have figured out by now how to avoid being scratched by the victim in order to avoid DNA under the nails, or that several of his there victims would also have had his DNA under their nails, and this DnA would be evidence in other cases, on a national data base, and when Z's DNA was found as a match to SS, they would have also seen it matched other cold cases.
I suppose by now Turkish police would have informed the public what kind of criminal Ziya is, and if he were indeed related to any other murders.
But I think no matter which country youre dealing with, law enforcement would have a database like AFIS. Its strange that evidence didnt lead them to Ziya sooner, and that they had to get samples from his sisters home.
If he is a known criminal, wouldnt there be some kind of information on him after being booked, even for petty crimes?
These people use aliases, they are the most dishonest and deceptive. False names is one way to avoid capture. How this or if this even factors in Ziyas background is something we dont know yet.
Also, each victim is different, so I imagine such criminals target people without knowing what kind of struggle might follow.
I think were all familiar with how often family and friends, sometimes even neighbors, tend to speak only of those redeeming qualities convicted criminals possess.
We dont know enough about this case, or the suspect(s). Im not exactly saying Ziya is a serial killer, but it also shouldnt be easily dismissed.
The person who committed this crime could be anyone and anything, passing himself off as a saint, like many criminals do. Sometimes they are rotting in prison when more crimes are attributed to them after many years. We dont know enough about Ziyas criminal history.
Ive read your posts and theory, and believe that if Ziya were recruited by professionals, they wouldnt take any chances by allowing him to live and become a potential witness.
He probably would be seeking police protection by now if he was fearful for his life, and attempting to minimize the minor role he played. If he is indeed not a violent person, or harmless and meek as so many speaking in his behalf claim, why does he refuse to turn himself in?
I think someone like that would be trying to clear his name, rather than incriminating himself.