Plausible, absolutely. I don't think it's suspicious. What is strange to me is the ways in which the public has received the information. The public only knows about the cook's account because DC said it in a voluntary interview. The interview was quite thorough, but lacked crucial detail, presumably because DC didn't have more info to give. And the interview was not on Nancy Grace. It has a few thousand views. My point is, if not for Lexi's family, we would know nothing. There would be no cook. There is nothing right now that makes the cook's account suspicious. We know nothing about this person, other than DC saying a cook saw Lexi go out the back but couldn't confirm she got in a car. What the cook allegedly saw in all of this would have lasted two seconds. He saw her walk out back. But we don't know who the cook is, whether the cook knows Lezi well, whether the cook talked to Lexi that day, who else was at the restaurant with the cook at the time, and lots more. What is suspicious/strange is how vague it is. According to DC there are 50+ billboards up in the area. It's almost as if LE said, "she ran away, good luck", and DC is now responsible for finding whoever took his 16 year old daughter. I presume DC gave the interview to share all the details he has to locate his daughter, so why isn't LE doing the same?
Does Boomer's have surveillance cameras? Yes or no? Were they looked at Monday morning when Lexi's belongings were found in the empty restaurant? Yes or no? This wouldn't take weeks. It could take 20 minutes with someone competent. Is this why DC was frustrated a detective took two days to reach out? Could/did the manager or owner of the restaurant help? LE didn't say "we reviewed footage from the restaurant and saw nothing", which at this point I wouldn't buy. Instead LE has said nothing. Imagine Lexi explicitly said she was going to run away - is it not the responsibility of LE to find her ASAP? She's not 31. She's not 19. What's the difference between "ran away" and "kidnapped" when a young girl goes missing? It's not a neighborhood, it's a restaurant. I absolutely believe cameras somewhere saw Lexi leave the restaurant. Why nothing has been mentioned about this is the most frustrating part. I'm not blaming anyone. I don't know who to blame. But I know a little about technology. A pro athlete gets in a fight at a bar and there's crystal clear footage. The notion that she "ran away" makes no difference to me because she's a minor. Does that make sense? I'm thinking out loud, sorry for repeating points. I hope Lexi is safe.
Edit: Someone spoke to the cook. Either DC, LE, or a combination. This was apparently the only person who saw anything. Since only one person saw Lexi leave and we have just fragments of the vague account, it's difficult. We mention the sunglasses, but we only know about the sunglasses from DC who got it from the cook. For all we know, there were no sunglasses. I think I keep repeating "need footage" because so much speculation results from what this cook might have seen, but frankly who knows if the cook is even a cook? IMO a lot is being assumed from what one person who we know nothing about might have seen, according to someone we think talked to this person? Did DC talk to the cook or LE?