And iirc, JMOM stated (in the last thread?) that the bite mark was in such a place as to lead her to believe EA got the bite in an altercation outside of a car, which I interpret to mean, 1, she has solid evidence there IS a bite mark, 2, she knows where the bite mark is located on EA's body, and 3, the location in itself raises some questions about how he got bit there.
Given all I have read and seen from JMOM, I believe she is giving us as much concrete and credible information as she can, and I, for one, will take what she says as good information until it is proven I cannot. IMO
I do try to scroll and roll, but sometimes . . . .