Gigglingtoes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2014
- Messages
- 2,756
- Reaction score
- 1,201
May be disputable in court but it might just stick in a juror's mind, given all the other injuries, and evidence.
You said it sista
May be disputable in court but it might just stick in a juror's mind, given all the other injuries, and evidence.
Don't you think that the rags have already been tested for dna? I think they were discovered in trash pull on 9/24???
Yes, remember during one of EA news interviews (the raw footage one) he said when he got his car back from PPD (the long 10-11day hold), the car no longer had a passenger seat belt and all of his floor mats were gone.
SO, my opinion is they surely submitted these items for forensic testing too. The affidavit never ever mentions any other swabs or submitted evidence except for that ONE swab from the trunk that had her DNA on it. They have so much in this guy.
Another thing I noticed in the latest arrest warrant, they mention they are aware of cell phones being equipped with GPS functions (in addition to ping info) and that is easily accessible from forensic technology. They have the big picture, they just need to narrow down a few loose ends....before we see his charges change from kidnapping to murder.
http://www.uptowndallasgirl.com/dallas-news/missing-woman-christina-morris-updates-and-how-to-help/
Found it! This is where Jonni stated what Christina's text messages said that were sent AFTER the picture sent to HF showing she had found the keys. And her very last text message which I feel is very important as well.
Praise the lord. Thank you.
Agreed, the coworker told LE he noticed what looked like a bite mark on EA's arm.
Was it determined what clothing Sprint employees wear at work?
Are they required to wear short sleeved polo type shirts?
Because, why would EA be so brazen about showing off his wounds if one of them was a bite mark from a woman who he knew would surely be reported missing sooner rather than later.
The employee would have observed the bite mark on Saturday, August 30. The bite mark would be fresh on that day (if really a bite mark from Christina). LE went to the Sprint location on Wednesday, September 3, or later.
Would evidence of a bite mark still be visible after so many days?
When it comes to trial, they'll need to present more evidence than "I think I noticed a bite mark" testimony.
The problem I'm having is accepting just how dumb or careless EA's actions were if he is solely responsible for Christina's disappearance and demise.
Wow, that could be incredibly helpful info!The 2010 Camaro is also equipped with an Event Data Recorder - a 'black box' - for cars. It records whether or not seat belts are being used in the event of an accident etc. If Christina was in the passenger seat that night when he damaged the front of his car- LE may have this info. I took a screenshot of the manual and will add a link to complete owners manual.
Wow, that could be incredibly helpful info!
Wow, interesting choice.
Supported by a team of forensic experts, investigators and appellate lawyer John Tatum, the firm never refuses a case because of its horrendous nature.
Plano red light camera locations: http://texas.drivinguniversity.com/red-light-cameras/red-light-camera-locations/plano-texas/
Allen has only one: McDermott/Alma
We don't even know all of the evidence that the detectives might have against EA, so it is really difficult to debate the holes that a defense attorney might punch in the case. Maybe they've got nothing but hearsay, maybe not? They either confirmed the bite mark or they didn't. And then what? I don't think the case is going to rest on the alleged bite mark. If it does, I'm sure we'd all agree they would be in trouble. It is hard to judge the evidence when we don't even know what it is yet...if this case goes to trial, hopefully they will have a number of factors, some stronger than others, for the jury to consider. And they will all add up to paint the picture. I am sure they are holding out hope, though, that they will find her, and that will provide them with more definitive evidence.
If those are the only ones listed as being red light cameras then there are MANY others with cameras. Perhaps they are recording? All I know is that I always make sure and stop because it feels like every dang intersection in the area has cameras!
I apologize to anyone who is offended by my posts. When it comes to this kinda stuff I don't take anything that anyone says for face value. It is my nature to question the validity of everything until I get proof.
Sorry if this way of gathering information offends you.
#FINDCHRISTINA
Not offended at all. Just giving my thoughts. Anyone who is easily offended should probably not be posting on a forum like this!
We have only seen the evidence needed for this initial arrest.. probably the tip of the iceberg of what LE actually has, knows & suspects. I'm just not that confident CM is in a wooded area, creek, field etc..
I apologize to anyone who is offended by my posts. When it comes to this kinda stuff I don't take anything that anyone says for face value. It is my nature to question the validity of everything until I get proof.
Sorry if this way of gathering information offends you.
#FINDCHRISTINA