She knows what he/she looks like and the weird thing is there is no APB so to speak saying "look for this person" out yet. So I'm thinking that LE has a really good leads on who this person is and they just aren't tipping their hand yet while they get more evidence. Thoughts?
Could be. But suppose he was wearing the black hoodie the entire time. What kind of description could CC provide? A tall/short, fat/skinny, white/black guy in a dark hoodie?
Or, perhaps he doesn't even exist. My point was to present a possible scenario where CC and "the male shooter" were unknown to each other, and how that would present obstacles to solving the crime, and proving CC's claims. It would be a clever maneuver on the part of a "mastermind" behind the murder.
Regardless, where they EACH and/or ALL screwed up -- mastermind, shooter, driver, whoever -- was in the failure to account for the presence of surveillance cameras. How foolish to drive into the garage in open view of the cameras, with no effort to obscure her view. The driver might as well have turned around and said "cheese".
In the long run, fingerprints, DNA, eyewitness statements, and biographical histories
might have led LE to the culprits, but those surveillance images sure did expedite matters. A picture always is worth a thousand words. And how often do you hear of a witness calling LE to say, "Hey, that's my car"? If it weren't so tragic and disgusting, it would be comical.