btw - A few days ago I posted about how the judge who gave Ethan 10 years probation for killing 4 people driving drunk is the same judge who gave a "poor, black teen" in 2004 20 years in prison for killing one person while driving drunk.
I apologize, I guess the teen who was sentenced for 20 years prison was not black. I only wrote that because that is what I saw written on another website and I just copied and pasted that sentence. I have never actually seen that teen etc. I should have done more research prior to posting that so I apologize.
I just saw that he is not black (not that it even matters - I just wanted to correct myself from my previous post) but he is indeed poor. Apparently in his case his public defender (of course he didn't have the $ for top notch attorneys) also told the judge that he should get a bit of a break - raised this way, it's all he knows, it's his upbringing etc (similar to Ethan's defense but the opposite since he was from a poor, troubled family).
Anyways, his family is of course telling the media they are outraged that this judge gave him 20 years prison at the age of 16 for killing one person and Ethan had 0 days in prison. How is that fair?
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...e-miller-outraged-couch-lam-article-1.2471292
It is a concern, that it's the very same judge hearing both cases. Inequities occur all over the criminal justice system, but when you see it occurring in the same courtroom it's a concern. On the other hand, these cases were 9 years apart. I wonder if she learned, during that time, that being lenient on 16 year old wild boys will sometimes turn them around. Maybe she actually changed philosophy during that nearly decade of hearing juvenile cases.