CONNIEHU
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 397
- Reaction score
- 114
Kampfer did say the search in area landfills may not be over yet.
http://www.ktxs.com/news/26545922/detail.html
http://www.ktxs.com/news/26545922/detail.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what did we learn from NG tonight?
- The earring Billie has said that Hailey was wearing when she went missing was found by Hailey's older brother at their dad's house when/after they moved out.
- The beautician who said she saw Hailey the day she went missing supposedly saw her with an African American boy. A picture posted at the Facebook supporting Clint shows an AA boy with Clint, Hailey and her older brother. He appears to be the son of Clint's girlfriend.
- Billie still hasn't faced the fact that the affidavit said Shawn admitted to threatening Hailey. She pointed out the fact that she had never heard that and said that there was a difference in Shawn threatening her and Clint's life (which Billie readily admits he did) and Shawn threatening either one of the kid's lives.
What else?
Sometimes I feel LE is misconstruing information or presenting it with language that is accusatory. Seems like they have no evidence to indict anyone but are trying to make a case. This has now become a high profile case, with it being known , there lapse in initiating an Amber Alert. I hope they are forthright in all they do. The good news is the Feds are there.
BBM
Do you have an idea of WHEN this earring was found, like last week vs. 6 months ago? I have no clue when there was a move, and as much as I would like to, I can't keep up with all the posts.TIA
Can we ask about the 7 yr olds father? He may well have been at CD's home, right where they found the earring. And CZ implied that he had a motive.
I thought H spent Sunday with BD?
Kampfer did say the search in area landfills may not be over yet.
http://www.ktxs.com/news/26545922/detail.html
Implied that who had a motive?
Sometimes I feel LE is misconstruing information or presenting it with language that is accusatory. Seems like they have no evidence to indict anyone but are trying to make a case. This has now become a high profile case, with it being known , there lapse in initiating an Amber Alert. I hope they are forthright in all they do. The good news is the Feds are there.
the earring thing.... gage earrings dont "fall' out, nor do you take them out ever while trying to stretch your lobes (*spew*)... so wth is that all about
Did Hailey start wearing her Christmas earrings as a fact?
or did she just have them showing them off?
Something about this sighting is bothering me - the one with Hailey and the little boy. Either:
1) LE believes it and is keeping a lot more evidence under wraps as far as who they suspect. Even if it's true, it doesn't mean the boy's father had anything to do with it. All if proves is that Hailey was fine/alive at noon on Monday.
or
2) LE has dismissed it. If they have, then I'm with them. JB also says she saw MB, yet MB says she didn't see or hear from Hailey at all on Monday. Somebody is either mistaken or lying.
Yeah, that "witness abduction" criteria has to go. IMO. If a child is lost, call out the guards!!In the case of the Amber Alert, iirc HD's case did not meet the criteria according to the guidelines. As for your other points concerning LE, it is a possibility.
IMO, the hairdresser's story with details completely checked out, except it was on Sunday instead of Monday.
In one of Cz's old posts when she was trying to send us clues about the 7 yr old boy she said [paraphrasing] " Darn it you guys, why not look more closely at
they boy and how he is connected and who has a motive here."
We successfully connected him to CD's gf, but saw no motive for her to harm HD. But I neglected to consider the boys father. In my opinion he might have a lot of anger towards CD over the baby.