dyannaON
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Messages
- 3,487
- Reaction score
- 9,330
He's dead; he shot himself. Or did I misunderstand your question???
Oops sorry I should have clarified. Our Toronto suspect.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's dead; he shot himself. Or did I misunderstand your question???
It's not a big deal. I saw the video on facebook. I just can't see it posted here. I might need to restart my old craptop or something.
Sorry I wasn’t very clear. The two locations (doorbell house and shooting house) are one minute’s distance between them per illustration upstream.I just tuned into this. What was one minute apart?
Oops sorry I should have clarified. Our Toronto suspect.![]()
(I’m surprised the Daily Mail didn’t shout this time HALF NAKED)Ok, I am trying to keep up with the flurry of posts. So, this link may have already been posted. If it has, forgive me for the duplication. This is the most recent update of the Daily Mail story:
Suspicious shooting DOORS away from where woman was seen in video half naked ringing doorbells | Daily Mail Online
Do all crime victims have the option of requesting to stay anonymous? Or does LE decide who they identify and who they don’t? Those may be a stupid questions but it has me puzzled a bit why it is important in a domestic violence case that the people involved not be named. Doesn’t that unfairly imply that the victim has something to be ashamed of, and isn’t it that kind of thinking that keeps this sort of crime hidden and in the dark instead of exposed for the absolute wrong that it is? I know traditionally rape victims have not been named unless they specifically give permission, but I did not realize the same might be true for family violence. Just trying to understand. I certainly do not want to add any further pain to the experience this woman went through, but violence is never the fault of the victim, no?
In all fairness, we don’t know that they didn’t.OK - now I have an issue with this. I usually don't like to question LE too much, but if a neighbor had told police that he saw a white van driving around the neighborhood at around the same time she was ringing door bells, how did they not find her sooner? It was quite obvious she was from the neighborhood. She had on no pants and no shoes. Did they canvas the neighborhood? It's not that big. I'd want to find anyone who owns a white van that lives there and certainly check on the safety of all females from that neighborhood.
Thank God she’s safe!
I know it’s not our biz but I’m the first to admit I am nosy as nosy can be. I want to know the circumstances, the restraints, everything.
I still have so many questions. Why the restraints? What caused her to escape and ring those doorbells the first time? Did she fear he was going to kill her? Was he really her boyfriend or more of a captor?
I accept that it's enough to know she's safe. Still, I wonder.
I would say chances are very high that she was the victim of sexual crime. My guess is the PIO was trying to put things as gently as possible by saying “family violence “.Do all crime victims have the option of requesting to stay anonymous? Or does LE decide who they identify and who they don’t? Those may be a stupid questions but it has me puzzled a bit why it is important in a domestic violence case that the people involved not be named. Doesn’t that unfairly imply that the victim has something to be ashamed of, and isn’t it that kind of thinking that keeps this sort of crime hidden and in the dark instead of exposed for the absolute wrong that it is? I know traditionally rape victims have not been named unless they specifically give permission, but I did not realize the same might be true for family violence. Just trying to understand. I certainly do not want to add any further pain to the experience this woman went through, but violence is never the fault of the victim, no?
So you have java script turned off? If so that’s why you can’t see the videos on here.
Do all crime victims have the option of requesting to stay anonymous? Or does LE decide who they identify and who they don’t? Those may be a stupid questions but it has me puzzled a bit why it is important in a domestic violence case that the people involved not be named. Doesn’t that unfairly imply that the victim has something to be ashamed of, and isn’t it that kind of thinking that keeps this sort of crime hidden and in the dark instead of exposed for the absolute wrong that it is? I know traditionally rape victims have not been named unless they specifically give permission, but I did not realize the same might be true for family violence. Just trying to understand. I certainly do not want to add any further pain to the experience this woman went through, but violence is never the fault of the victim, no?
Mine is on and I can't see the video either.