FWIW. This doesn't prove or disprove anything. It's just one article/study on "suicide staging," which seems to be increasing. The authors of the study attribute that to CSI-type shows and movies teaching people how forensics work and that hiding murder is harder than ever. The authors also call for medical examiners to be well aware of the trend. Statistics below from (2014) Getting Away With Murder: An Examination of Detected Homicides Staged as Suicides:
- 93% of suicide stagers are men
- 50% of staged suicides involve intimate relationships
- 75% have no suicide notes
- 68% involve rearrangement of body
- 44% of the staged suicides studied were called homicides by medical examiner
- weapons were almost always rearranged to simulate suicide
- at least 50% of stagers "discover" their victim
- in US the majority of staged suicides are gun-related
SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class journal research
Thanks for this. What I get out of all that is that:
- Although on the increase, murders staged to look like suicides are still extremely rare when compared to the actual number of suicides per capita which are also increasing themselves
- That the statistics are a big zero for events where kids were murdered, then a suicide of a parent staged to make it seem as if that parent murdered their kids then suicided
- That statistics are still zero where a parent who found their kids murdered, then committed suicide themselves
- That, after the investigations into who killed the girls is completed, that the statistics will still read zero for all of the above.
What I have got from sheriff's statement - NOT the initial statements being bantied about on the site because we all know that initial reports are always inaccurate as the rush to get breaking news out happens is that:
-
"It's not that I doubt the ME's findings, but I've still got two murders to investigate" the sheriff has no issue with the ME finding of 2 X murder / 1 X suicide because that is what evidence at the scene also showed, but
- who actually murdered the girls still needs to be determined and ergo the investigation continues
IMO, that above bolded statement by the sheriff, made
after he had actually been in the scene, also explains why it went from "3 dead from gunshots (before he went into the scene)" to "Murder/suicide" (after he went into the scene) … because something actually IN the scene leads to a conclusion of suicide for the mother.
Take this:
Police enter scene of triple shooting. Evidence in the scene leads police and ME to conclusion of double-murder/suicide. Father has killed two children then committed suicide, but will investigate further to make sure it was Father who killed the 2 kids. Father has a demonstrated history of relationship problems and failed relationships - has fathered 3 children with different partners. Has at least two divorces, but is no longer with the parent of the youngest child either. Father is now in what is, at least, their 4th relationship. Father has previously been charged with - and convicted - of domestic violence against one of those partners. Father is suspected to have killed 2 daughters, then committed suicide themself.
Change father to mother and we have Nichol.
In any other case, the above facts would be used to back-up why dad is
guilty. Yet, in this case those who point out these things/facts about a Mom are accused of unnecessarily spinning her relationships' history - which apparently should be ignored as a red flag, of bringing up a conviction for DV of an apparent individual who isn't capable of anything like this and therefore should also be ignored as a red flag etc etc and those whom seem to read all articles with the statement above, in blue font, directly from the sheriff's mouth with it struck out. That's a critical statement from actual LE made after he had been in the scene - being ignored. None of this would be ignored were the suspected killer of their children a man.
I'm a girl in the army and all for equal rights. IMO, Nichol gets to "own" her facts here. Too bad she killed the kids too.