I wonder how research is coming along of PJD?
Thanks for sharing this!! That’s amazing news for her!The recent change at GEDmatch of opting all users in for doe cases has given her a huge bump! Her highest match is now 183.9! Prior to this, her highest match on GEDmatch and FTDNA was 59.9.
I think it is Apache Junction Jane Doe (AR), not Plainview Jane Doe (TX)The recent change at GEDmatch of opting all users in for doe cases has given her a huge bump! Her highest match is now 183.9! Prior to this, her highest match on GEDmatch and FTDNA was 59.9.
I just noticed that. Well PJD’s is 94.1, that’s still pretty decent!I think it is Apache Junction Jane Doe (AR), not Plainview Jane Doe (TX)
She has 101.9 cM on both Gedmatch and FTDNA (it seams it is the same person), but after the recent changes on Gedmatch her number of matches over 40cM have grown from 3 to 13, also she now has 2 matches with family tree, before she had none...I just noticed that. Well PJD’s is 94.1, that’s still pretty decent!
Oops! You’re right. My apologies - it’s too late for me to edit my post and remove.I think it is Apache Junction Jane Doe (AR), not Plainview Jane Doe (TX)
Wait, what? I hadn't heard about this, but I'm also a tad out of the loop. If that's true then that's amazing news for all the cases in the pipeline, especially for those Does from underrepresented groups.The recent change at GEDmatch of opting all users in for doe cases has given her a huge bump! Her highest match is now 183.9! Prior to this, her highest match on GEDmatch and FTDNA was 59.9.
Wait, what? I hadn't heard about this, but I'm also a tad out of the loop. If that's true then that's amazing news for all the cases in the pipeline, especially for those Does from underrepresented groups.
yes! as of last week, GEDMatch updated their terms of service to allow for full access for Doe identification only (no criminal investigation)!
The only reason I haven’t submitted this is because it’s a DDP case. It seems too obvious right? But then I can’t remember if she was determined to be black before or after they started on her case. Hopefully, if it was after, they’ve revisited the databases. Even then, she wasn’t in NamUs until this month.The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)
Normally I don't suggest matches on DDP cases, but Debra Denise Terrell seems like almost a perfect match for Plainview Jane Doe.
The only reason I haven’t submitted this is because it’s a DDP case. It seems too obvious right? But then I can’t remember if she was determined to be black before or after they started on her case. Hopefully, if it was after, they’ve revisited the databases. Even then, she wasn’t in NamUs until this month.