TX TX - Prisma Denisse Peralta Reyes, 26, did not pick up her child, Mesquite, 17 Apr 2019 #2

[Suglo]

I wish we could all use the term “ex bf” for the previous bf who she called that afternoon before disappearing (and who called into Gray’s show) and “current bf” for the one who she met up with at the bar, whose apartment she went to and who supposedly was in another town that afternoon/evening. All these exes can be confusing.

 

[mrstfs]

I wish we could all use the term “ex bf” for the previous bf who she called that afternoon before disappearing (and who called into Gray’s show) and “current bf” for the one who she met up with at the bar, whose apartment she went to and who supposedly was in another town that afternoon/evening. All these exes can be confusing.

Did he actually refer to himself as her ex boyfriend? I must’ve missed that on the interview.

 

[Suglo]

Did he actually refer to himself as her ex boyfriend? I must’ve missed that on the interview.

I haven’t listened to the whole thing yet but my understanding is that he is an ex from a while back. The VI Winter referred to him as an ex towards the beginning of the case when giving us a timeline of calls she made right before she disappeared.

 

[mrstfs]

I haven’t listened to the whole thing yet but my understanding is that he is an ex from a while back. The VI Winter referred to him as an ex towards the beginning of the case when giving us a timeline of calls she made right before she disappeared.

Ok, my recollection is that’s a different call and not the guy (C) in Gray’s interview but JMO.

 

[Suglo]

Ok, my recollection is that’s a different call and not the guy (C) in Gray’s interview but JMO.

Shoot. I could be wrong then. Didn’t she also call a male friend who is not an ex? Maybe I’m getting the two mixed up.

 

[mrstfs]

Shoot. I could be wrong then. Didn’t she also call a male friend who is not an ex? Maybe I’m getting the two mixed up.

Here’s my understanding from previous VI info... She called 4 guys between the elevator video and 6:01. Not in any order... One is lunch ex/currentbf one of them is the guy (C) on Gray’s video, one is a previous ex, and one is the guy who was out of town.

 

[Dre]

Calling so many people in such a short time frame is baffling.. she was so anxious about something is what that says to me.. Did she call the babysitter back during those several calls near 6pm?
Did LE ever search abusive ex’s apartment?
I think the babysitter and/or abusive lover hold the key.. I think babysitter knows (more or less) what happened to her..

 

[Suglo]

Here’s my understanding from previous VI info... She called 4 guys between the elevator video and 6:01. Not in any order... One is lunch ex/currentbf one of them is the guy (C) on Gray’s video, one is a previous ex, and one is the guy who was out of town.

I totally missed one of those men/calls. I wish we had a detailed written out timeline for this case that includes all the phone calls and to whom they were.

 

[Suglo]

Calling so many people in such a short time frame is baffling.. she was so anxious about something is what that says to me.. Did she call the babysitter back during those several calls near 6pm?
Did LE ever search abusive ex’s apartment?
I think the babysitter and/or abusive lover hold the key.. I think babysitter knows (more or less) what happened to her..

BBM- I was just thinking the same exact thing.

Actually, I’m thinking the same about your whole post.

 

[indicolite22]

No, she did not call the babysitter again after that long afternoon call. LE would need probable cause for an appartment search. There was no sign of foul play. IMO the babysitter might have known what the ex/current bf was capable of, but I doubt she could have predicted what would actually happen and where.

ETA: According to the call log, she also tried to call the out of state friend (from her later last successful call) and her current bf at around the time she turned around and headed back toward the Olympus.

 

[Teche]

She didn't drop the gun anywhere. The gun was found in her jeep.

Could she have 2 weapons...a military issue and a personal handgun?

 

[Teche]

Here’s my understanding from previous VI info... She called 4 guys between the elevator video and 6:01. Not in any order... One is lunch ex/currentbf one of them is the guy (C) on Gray’s video, one is a previous ex, and one is the guy who was out of town.

I think we need to go to initials...way too confusing.

 

[CaseyLPC]

Could she have 2 weapons...a military issue and a personal handgun?

I don't believe the military issues reservists weapons unless they are deployed or they are on MP type duty. JMO

 

[mrstfs]

I think we need to go to initials...way too confusing.

I would but I assume it’s against the rules.

 

[Sillybilly]

I would but I assume it’s against the rules.

Initials are fine (preferable actually) as long as the individuals are mentioned in MSM or by LE. If it's just from sleuthing social media, they are not allowed to be discussed.

 

[lisa122473]

So the babysitter has been mentioned in MSM, has the violent ex-boyfriend?

 

[Jethro4WS]

So the babysitter has been mentioned in MSM, has the violent ex-boyfriend?

No.

 

[Kittybunny]

I think we’re confusing ex’s here... the ex she went to lunch with isn’t the guy who called into Gray’s interview.

Thank you! Yes! I was totally confused because until recently we have been referring to the guy she had lunch with as the ex! Got it now!

 

[ilovechili]

I thought I had these people straight until the past few pages lmao.

Correct me if I am wrong--

1. She met an ex for lunch and he was the one who lived at the apartment complex and allegedly had an alibi and was out of town later in the day;

2. She also called another ex which is a different person.

3. She called a male friend by accident when she meant to call the ex in #1. Twice I think. He told her he wasn't who she thought. He claimed to know her, said the ex in #1 was abusive but never referred to he himself as an ex or ever having been a bf. He told her she had reached him and not the person she was trying to reach (the ex in #1).

4. There is another guy who "bought" her vehicle for her and we are unsure if he is any of the above.

5. And then there is the babysitter.

This is how I have understood it, do I have it all wrong? Correct me if so please. We do need some system if not initials I think and agree

Jmo.

 

[Joseph.dale]

I thought I had these people straight until the past few pages lmao.

Correct me if I am wrong--

1. She met an ex for lunch and he was the one who lived at the apartment complex and allegedly had an alibi and was out of town later in the day;

2. She also called another ex which is a different person.

3. She called a male friend by accident when she meant to call the ex in #1. Twice I think. He told her he wasn't who she thought. He claimed to know her, said the ex in #1 was abusive but never referred to he himself as an ex or ever having been a bf. He told her she had reached him and not the person she was trying to reach (the ex in #1).

4. There is another guy who "bought" her vehicle for her and we are unsure if he is any of the above.

5. And then there is the babysitter.

This is how I have understood it, do I have it all wrong? Correct me if so please. We do need some system if not initials I think and agree

Jmo.

Non violent Ex, she accidentally called. Baby’s dad was out of town, not in the picture. Not sure if guy that bought her the Jeep was the guy she was going to visit (guy she was back with who had a violent history).