The docket can be searched on the public court site. We are not allowed to link it here. I don’t recall if all the documents could be read through the links. I do not believe they can be.
Without violating TOS here, I think I can safely offer this summary which I believe is accurate. Anyone can read the docket. The parents were “separated” and had a custody order in place, but then in Jan 2020 another plan was submitted by one parent and then the other parent immediately filed for divorce. My personal experience (no legal skills) led me me to believe the filing of the divorce trumped the order in place while separated, and the parties did not agree to what was in force, or the plan that was submitted, was never “registered” or “ordered” by the court. DO’s atty touched on this when he said they believed DO had custody. It did not appear that another custody order had been placed once the divorce was filed. moo
I believe
@txyorkiemom had a very detailed explanation of Tx law ( or lawlessness, as it seems we’re discovering with this case) in the last thread.
another point ive been stuck on, in all the discussion about schools and why weren’t they tracking if registering parent had custody etc. when I enrolled each of my children, in each school in PA , I had to provide copies of the custody agreement and fill out copious paperwork. I can only believe that DO must have had the “non entered” plan he believed to be in force in order to be enrolling Samuel. Doesn’t TX require similar documentation?