Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So the public spends 5 weeks trying to analyze that SWFA video and finally something concrete pops up and MPD goes silent. Why?
Originally Posted by bernst View Post
True but what's interesting is you can't check into a PLACE if you're not actually there. You can check into a LOCATION (city, state) - like BB did - however, you have to actually be there for the PLACE to even show up on your list of "check-in" options. He manually typed in the name of the restaurant, which I find interesting.
And as for alibi's - if someone can find me two sources where BB and/or KS state that BB flew American that day - um, we have another "red flag" to add to the list.
And finally, the last MPD addressed the public about this Altima and the tools used, we were told that the Altima was NOT a suspect vehicle and we were told that the tools belonged to the church.
I shared these images with them on 2/7 and was given permission by MPD to distribute to others to see if they could help clear them up.
So, I took it to the next level and reached out to the National Center for Media Forensics (professionals that have proper security clearance to work with FBI, CIA, NASA, NSA) and they help law enforcement all the time. They helped to analyze the Boston Marathon bombing and the ISIS beheadings of the two journalists - two of MANY examples of where they have helped to analyze, enhance and authentic digital surveillance. They are willing to look at this video and run it through their software and analyze and work DIRECTLY with MPD but they need to original source file before it was uploaded to YouTube and no one will provide it.
Flag this message Delete this message
Today, 01:43 PM#646 bernst bernst is online no
Because I was communicating with the FBI at the same time I was communicating with MPD and they were also unaware of the items that can be seen in the car. I copied the FBI resource on the same email that went to FBI offering up this support without a response to take them up on their offer and as of last Friday, NCMF still had not heard from them.Quote Originally Posted by Seriously? View Post
I mean no disrespect with this question. Since we have recent confirmation from MPD that the FBI continues to assist on this case, why would we assume the FBI hasn't already explored this option, if it was considered appropriate?
bernst Today, 01:46 PM#647In fact, it was through my discussion with the FBI resource and his comment about the perception that the public has re: FBI having an endless amount of resources available to them to do this kind of thing. It was further emphasized at that time that you can only go so far with enhancing an image before you begin to distort it, etc. etc. I had not reached out to NCMF at that time yet so he was unaware that this request was coming. I was basically told you can only go SO FAR with video image enhancement. And again, he was copied on the offer of support with no response.
I can't remember where this information appears in our discussions, but we talked about the check in and picture for a loooong time! Very early on when suspicions were rampant. I'm not volunteering to try to find it, so I'm doing this from memory. If I'm remembering correctly, there was a consensus that the picture that posted was not a recent shot of the restaurant. There was discussion about where the plants are placed by the door, the size of the plants and lighting, which led us to believe the check in picture was not taken April 17th but was the picture from the restaurant's site. I also want to add these discussions were had when there were very high numbers of folks posting on the thread, so many perspectives were heard.
Does anyone else remember all this?
RBBM. 1) We know for a fact, per SWFA comments directly on their SWFA comments section where the Altima video was posted Dec 5, 2016. By SWFA on their own. MPD was not involved in them posting. So that means SWFA is in possession of the video they uploaded to their YouTube channel.
Quote Originally Posted by arkansasmimi View Post
That is condensation on window(s), can see it in other sections on the SWFA video.
I haven't been big on speculation about people or faces but this is one is definitely not condensation:
https://1drv.ms/i/s!Apszq3ro5jJLvCP0_9vIybRQqeAF
How do you know that? Because MPD said so? Ok, let me ask this - anyone know who he was traveling with? Nope. Don't you think that person would be standing up in his defense?
True but what's interesting is you can't check into a PLACE if you're not actually there. You can check into a LOCATION (city, state) - like BB did - however, you have to actually be there for the PLACE to even show up on your list of "check-in" options. He manually typed in the name of the restaurant, which I find interesting.
And as for alibi's - if someone can find me two sources where BB and/or KS state that BB flew American that day - um, we have another "red flag" to add to the list.
And finally, the last MPD addressed the public about this Altima and the tools used, we were told that the Altima was NOT a suspect vehicle and we were told that the tools belonged to the church.
I shared these images with them on 2/7 and was given permission by MPD to distribute to others to see if they could help clear them up.
So, I took it to the next level and reached out to the National Center for Media Forensics (professionals that have proper security clearance to work with FBI, CIA, NASA, NSA) and they help law enforcement all the time. They helped to analyze the Boston Marathon bombing and the ISIS beheadings of the two journalists - two of MANY examples of where they have helped to analyze, enhance and authentic digital surveillance. They are willing to look at this video and run it through their software and analyze and work DIRECTLY with MPD but they need to original source file before it was uploaded to YouTube and no one will provide it.
Flag this message Delete this message
I noticed that MPD has still not responded to the question, which inquired if the MB case was cold, on their Facebook page. Sometimes the things that are not said are the most powerful. Where are the people demanding answers? Where is the push for Missy's justice? LE, the media, and her family are all silent. It's so frustrating.
Despite the suspect being caught on video, the public still doesn't know whether the SP is male or female. We still don't know SP's height (a 5-inch range is insane). We still don't know if the Altima is involved. We know absolutely nothing about the suspect other than (s)he wore a swat outfit. Unfortunately, we don't even know if the outfit is real or fake. How does anyone expect this case to be solved? Are those working on the case waiting for a confession? I wish that there was a desire from somebody, anybody to increase exposure so that this case can be solved.
ETA - Statistically speaking, SP is not male. Only .61% of males are 5'2" or shorter. That means that over 99% of males are taller than 5'2". The percentage of males who are 5'7" or shorter is 21.7%. And yet, we still don't know SP's gender.
SBM
I am thankful for SWFA trying to push this to a resolution. Perhaps, they are just as frustrated as some of us here. I can't imagine that it was easy for them to publish that information, especially in a small town. I keep checking the news and waiting to see that they were raided.
Gracias. ;-)
The height range is actually 6 inches, from 5-2 to 5-7. Agree with you, that's crazy.
Also agree with you on where are all the people wanting answers? If I were the public, living in or near Midlothian, I'd stage a peaceful gathering in front of MPD on April 18. I would also suggest writing/emailing every news source in the Dallas area encouraging them to do a piece on MB around April 18.
As for gender and height, I don't believe that 5-7 is the max for this perp. And in north Texas, as elsewhere, there is a significant Hispanic population, and Hispanic males statistically are shorter in height. I am in no way saying that MB's killer is Hispanic; just saying that I don't believe it's valid to state so strongly that "SP is not male".
The height range is actually 6 inches, from 5-2 to 5-7. Agree with you, that's crazy.
Also agree with you on where are all the people wanting answers? If I were the public, living in or near Midlothian, I'd stage a peaceful gathering in front of MPD on April 18. I would also suggest writing/emailing every news source in the Dallas area encouraging them to do a piece on MB around April 18.
As for gender and height, I don't believe that 5-7 is the max for this perp. And in north Texas, as elsewhere, there is a significant Hispanic population, and Hispanic males statistically are shorter in height. I am in no way saying that MB's killer is Hispanic; just saying that I don't believe it's valid to state so strongly that "SP is not male".
KS was quoted directly in a newspaper interview as saying BB took American, fwiw. But respectfully, I can't imagine how the name of the airline that took him to Gulfport/Biloxi really matters. If he was there, he wasn't in Midlothian, regardless of which airline took him there. And LE says they have verified he was in MS just as he said he was.
I just think cases like this take time...there was another girl in DFW and it took what seemed like forever for the guy to be convicted. They had proof of them together on video, and her body has never been found.
There will be an arrest eventually, and I think in hindsight the lack of communication around it will make sense. JMO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe there are some issues with the times of flights by American on the day(s) that he traveled?