I hear ya! And you're likely correct. But, not quite willing to let this go...just yet.
Hi @Itsapuzzle No worries about wacky thoughts. I've had my own. One warrant said the killer may have used a phone to record the slaying. I haven't seen where that theory has been definitely ruled out although it was later said it was unlikely. So, never say never.
Seems like a point in favor of targetted, planned murder. Someone who commits a break-in just to fool around or look for valuables, doesn't worry about turning off their phone, IMO.
Just read that article, very interesting gliving, thanks for that.Hi @Itsapuzzle No worries about wacky thoughts. I've had my own. One warrant said the killer may have used a phone to record the slaying. I haven't seen where that theory has been definitely ruled out although it was later said it was unlikely. So, never say never.
Slain fitness instructor Missy Bevers received 'creepy and strange' message days before death, search warrant says
I agree SP appears to adjust his/her collar and check something, possibly the time?View attachment 290688
Okay, so this is where it looks like a phone.
Here's my theory at this point.
His phone sounds an alert at 0.23 and at that moment he turns to look at camera instinctively, then goes back to trying to open door. By 0.42/0.43 the tools are put away. At 0.43/44 he displays body language like he's having a quick think about looking at phone - he's gonna do it - I see phone flip up, he looks briefly, then it's back in pocket. It's all over by 0.49 when he walks off. It looks like something is missing there in the footage, it doesn't flow smoothly with his feet movements. Yes, @Inthedetails, was someone doing surveillance for him, alerting him to what was going on outside? What time did Missy leave her home, would it match in with her departure time?
And if there was phone activity picked up wouldn't LE keep it under their hat?
PS: I only saw this when I looked at the footage on my iPhone, had it at 720p and put it on 0.25 speed and zoomed in. And had on magnified by 4 glasses. I can't un-see it now
Aren't there ways to disguise your identity on cellphones - burner phones, for example, that are thrown away after the crime?
View attachment 290688
Okay, so this is where it looks like a phone.
Here's my theory at this point.
His phone sounds an alert at 0.23 and at that moment he turns to look at camera instinctively, then goes back to trying to open door. By 0.42/0.43 the tools are put away. At 0.43/44 he displays body language like he's having a quick think about looking at phone - he's gonna do it - I see phone flip up, he looks briefly, then it's back in pocket. It's all over by 0.49 when he walks off. It looks like something is missing there in the footage, it doesn't flow smoothly with his feet movements. Yes, @Inthedetails, was someone doing surveillance for him, alerting him to what was going on outside? What time did Missy leave her home, would it match in with her departure time?
And if there was phone activity picked up wouldn't LE keep it under their hat?
PS: I only saw this when I looked at the footage on my iPhone, had it at 720p and put it on 0.25 speed and zoomed in. And had on magnified by 4 glasses. I can't un-see it now
Snipped.
I'm impressed you have footage with a timecode...was that the initial release but it was wiped from the later footage released?
All of this meandering and smashing seems like the act of the addle minded.
Yes, except quite deliberate and systematic, as has been pointed out. Not walking aimlessly, going back to place they were before, or reacting like: pulling on door, door doesn't open, rattles door, walks away, goes back, pulls out various tools, drops one on the floor, pulls again on door, tries tool wrong way, pulls on door, etc etc, which IMO would be the behaviour of an addled brain.
