KrazyKatLadi
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2012
- Messages
- 1,079
- Reaction score
- 17
Local here - it happened. Not a rumor.
Wonder what they were looking for? Receipts? Is it legal to take DNA samples from trash?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Local here - it happened. Not a rumor.
IMO, I don't think anyone would want to frame him or his wife. If the police found something incriminating such as gear, etc. I believe they would have arrested them, end of story. I think this is much bigger than that. I believe we only have a tiny fraction of the big picture. But I could be wrong. I just don't see why NYPD would be involved if it was as simple as a jealous spouse or something like that. At this time I am sticking with my thought of more than one party involved and the possibility of an internal investigation going on simultaneously. That is STRICTLY MY OPINION!
It's been discussed once or twice in these 9 threads.....(Or are we on 10?)
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
So do you think it was LE that took the trash to go through?
# 11 . At the top on the URL for each page, the number right before /page55 is the number the thread is we are on, for future reference.
Not sure I can tell on Tapatalk 😊# 11 . At the top on the URL for each page, the number right before /page55 is the number the thread is we are on, for future reference.
Good observation. Yes, it looks like if there was some sort of creepy message through LinkedIn, LE would have a way to retrieve it.Just reading between some lines here based on the wording of the affidavits. While LE confirms having found LinkedIn flirtatious messages dating back to January - but they only describe the "creepy" message in terms of being told by a friend that she saw it and didn't remember who it was from.
To me it sounds like they weren't able to confirm the creepy message and may not believe it actually happened.
What do y'all think?
Originally Posted by thinksalot View Post
Someone mentioned that AJ T said on Facebook that someone was going through his trash or that his trash was taken by LE. My concern is that whoever did this might have been evil enough to try to plant evidence in that trash that they hoped would be incriminating. Could the perp have thrown costume or parts of costume away in that trash in hopes it would be linked to that family? Did the perp intentionally wear things resembling items trainer might have worn in another attempt to draw attention to him?
BBM
I read that it was a Facbook post by a neighbor saying someone removed trash. I put that story in the rumor column.
Yes.So do you think it was LE that took the trash to go through?
Not sure I can tell on Tapatalk ��
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Wonder what they were looking for? Receipts? Is it legal to take DNA samples from trash?
Wonder what they were looking for? Receipts? Is it legal to take DNA samples from trash?
I cannot get my head around the amount of subterfuge and planning required to murder MB when it could be simpler to murder her via an ambush on her way to the class. A local reported that she lived in an area that was quite remote and a large distance between houses. If murder was the objective, how much easier would it have been to stage an ambush (flat tyre; fake car accident etc..) in an area that could be much easier controlled. Or during the day in her home when the kids are at school. If it is someone she knew, she probably would have opened the door even to a partner of someone she was having an affair with.
Instead the perp has staged an elaborate disguise; had to factor in an indoor venue change due to weather; taken the risk of other campers arriving earlier or it taking longer and not being able to get away (what if MB ran late); working out how to get there and away in SWAT gear (or where to stash gear); run the gauntlet of cameras in the church and gun shop (assuming (s)he knew about them) plus over-power a fit strong woman if (s)he didn’t use a gun (TBC).
Further, the perp has likely made it more personal with LE by impersonating them through the choice of outfit with ‘POLICE’ on it.
I don’t necessarily believe she interrupted a burglary unless there is more to that particular church than is apparent. So if there isn’t something at that particular church worth stealing and murdering for, if it wasn’t a robbery and wasn’t a planned murder, what else could it be? What hit man (or woman) would take a job with the level of risk this one involved? I just don’t get the risk involved to murder her when there would be much lower risk ways to accomplish this without leaving any video footage behind or risk of being interrupted by other campers.
I would love to hear other’s thoughts on this.
Get a desktop, oldtimer !![]()
Still has not been publicly confirmed. An alibi, especially one that is non-routine or elaborate, can actually be an indication of involvement. I'm interested in finding out who notified BB of his wife's death and exactly where he was at the time he was notified. I found it odd that he drove his rental car back to TX, supposedly after learning of the murder.
It should be legal if the trash is at the curb. If DNA is tested, and matches a crime scene, then they would have probable cause to get a warrant for the DNA of their suspects from there.
Thank you for this! Missy may have had her own plan because her phone was probably a tax write off. If she used it for her business, she could write off the expense.