sdmike1974
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2010
- Messages
- 236
- Reaction score
- 259
In the aftermath of the release of the search warrant affidavits it seemed like most of the media attention focused on three main areas:
1. Possible infidelity by Missy, Brandon or both. (A shout-out to Nancy Grace for noting that the affidavit did not necessarily conclude there was infidelity by BOTH. Something I had noticed as well.)
2. Financial difficulties in the marriage.
3. Whether or not smartphone video or stills were taken at the crime scene.
What was not given much attention was the following excerpt about the "creepy" LinkedIn communication:
"We have reasonable grounds to believe that the killer, who is still at large and poses an immediate danger to other human beings, communicated with the Decedent in this manner in the time period between April 14, 2016 and April 16, 2016."
Does this mean that if they can determine through the IP address and other data provided by LinkedIn who the real source of what appears to be a fake account holder possibly posing as a man, then this could lead to either naming a suspect -- or at least a strong #1 POI?
IMO it depends on what inferences can be made from LE stating, "reasonable grounds to believe that's the killer."
It's possible LE may already have that information, given the affidavits date back to the end of April and are simply building as strong a prosecution case as possible -- and determining whether there is one -- or multiple (i.e., a conspiracy) -- suspects.
1. Possible infidelity by Missy, Brandon or both. (A shout-out to Nancy Grace for noting that the affidavit did not necessarily conclude there was infidelity by BOTH. Something I had noticed as well.)
2. Financial difficulties in the marriage.
3. Whether or not smartphone video or stills were taken at the crime scene.
What was not given much attention was the following excerpt about the "creepy" LinkedIn communication:
"We have reasonable grounds to believe that the killer, who is still at large and poses an immediate danger to other human beings, communicated with the Decedent in this manner in the time period between April 14, 2016 and April 16, 2016."
Does this mean that if they can determine through the IP address and other data provided by LinkedIn who the real source of what appears to be a fake account holder possibly posing as a man, then this could lead to either naming a suspect -- or at least a strong #1 POI?
IMO it depends on what inferences can be made from LE stating, "reasonable grounds to believe that's the killer."
It's possible LE may already have that information, given the affidavits date back to the end of April and are simply building as strong a prosecution case as possible -- and determining whether there is one -- or multiple (i.e., a conspiracy) -- suspects.