observation
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2014
- Messages
- 1,388
- Reaction score
- 34
CT is a pretty smart girl.
Do you mean MT or CT? Just curious.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
CT is a pretty smart girl.
Yes or someone that maybe helped her from time to time. JMO but this crime was well executed from start to finish. I don't think it was planned for a rainy day but it sure didn't hurt their (yes I said their) plan. It would be interesting if SWFA may have video in weeks leading up to murder if a car was seen in the parking lot at that time of the morning (LE has probably already thought of this) or if the church cameras outside were working and may have picked up something. Just my thoughts.
Maybe so but all the assumptions aside, Camp Gladiators is pretty shady. I've worked in the largest retailers office (in the world dear) and I know practices. That contract is a real bad deal and no one picks up the phone on the other end. Missy worked for a commission only. Camp Gladiators is not in my area, but then again, neither is Payday Loans.
I think MT was eluding to the fact that there was a lot of crock pot meals and that the family was not having meals together because of MBs CG schedule and the schedule of the girls sports schedules. Yes lots of parents make crock pot meals no harm there but JMO she was taking a dig at MB. (Sorry SandyQS - didn't mean to get you in trouble)
If I'm remembering correctly, she was soon moving from this location to a less isolated place. Agree - it was very well executed and the rain may have caused some minor problems - like a need to change out of wet clothes, not leave a lot of food prints outside (but really, we don't know if they did or didn't). Agree that those outside cameras picked up something, and it's not disclosed and/or the inside cameras have a much better picture of the killer than we've seen. Hope so.
This is similar to a thought I had a week or two ago when it seemed like there was more than one potentially guilty looking person. It wouldn't be crazy to think two people stood to gain from her death, separate, independent and unaware of the other (either with the same motive or different motive).I think there were possible a few individuals that wanted MB dead. Certainly a few whose reaction does not match grief.The plan was created to have set in stone alibis fora few- with an airtight plan for the murderer with identity concealment. Many planned murders involve a group.
I am think a combo deal happened- my guess a tri-angle. The group involved had different reasons for wanting her murdered. But one stepped up for the kill- maybe got played by the group to execute. JMHO
Do you mean MT or CT? Just curious.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is it just me, or for some of the rest of you, is it not mind-blowingly-bizarre how MB's mother-in-law has somehow become a target for suspicion, over the course of a number of pages here?
Respectfully BBM, I have seen this posted multiple times here at WS, but nothing in the MSM or on her FB from time I started following this case that said she was moving from Creekside. Do you have a like or know where it was said? Thanks (just asking not meaning to be snarky sounding)
SteveS is correct [sbm] IMHO. He says a SW may not be kept secret, which is true. You can read the Texas rules of criminal procedure chapter 18 regarding search warrants and you will not find anywhere in there a provision for keeping a SW secret. And in fact, Article 18.011(d)(1) says specifically that an order issued under this section (talking about the sealing of an affidavit) may NOT prohibit the disclosure of information about the SW. We know that the affidavits in the MB case have not been sealed - they've just been withheld from release which isn't the same thing (no judge's order). But if 18.011(d)(1) applies to a sealed affidavit, it must apply to an unsealed affidavit as well.
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CR/htm/CR.18.htm
http://law.onecle.com/texas/criminal-procedure/18.011.html
[sbm]We know of the previous search warrants because MPD made us aware of them. But if they chose not to tell the public or the news media that they had gotten additional SWs, then there's the possibility that no one has gone looking yet.
No new leads![]()
Anyone think LE is any closer to an arrest?
Sent from my Nexus 7
Is it just me, or for some of the rest of you, is it not mind-blowingly-bizarre how MB's mother-in-law has somehow become a target for suspicion, over the course of a number of pages here?
Respectfully BBM, I have seen this posted multiple times here at WS, but nothing in the MSM or on her FB from time I started following this case that said she was moving from Creekside. Do you have a like or know where it was said? Thanks (just asking not meaning to be snarky sounding)
Is it just me, or for some of the rest of you, is it not mind-blowingly-bizarre how MB's mother-in-law has somehow become a target for suspicion, over the course of a number of pages here?
Websleuths is different than any other forum on the internet. If you are used to forums like topix then you are going to find out quickly websleuths is not topix. We don’t allow rumors. We don’t allow comments from facebook or comments from other forums. We work hard to make sure everyone stays on topic. We allow and encourage appropriate sleuthing. Most of all we want you to become involved and enjoy your experience at websleuths. You can review our rules right here: http://www.websleuths.com/forums/for...?159-the-rules
*Please no personal chatter back and forth. Welcoming someone back or making jokes at other member’s expense is not going to be allowed. The case is about Missy Bevers. Please do not make the thread about you.
* YOU CAN SPECULATE ABOUT PEOPLE IN THE SEARCH WARRANTS AS LONG AS YOU USE THEIR INITIALS ONLY. This overrides an earlier decision I made. My apologies for the confusion. It is 100 percent my fault.
*if you do speculate please do not make comments on their personal appearance. That’s just rude. You can speculate on their behavior but if you want to post something unkind about their looks please don’t.
*Speculation is allowed if it involves someone who has been named in the mainstream media and you can logically put this person at the scene of the crime or can suggest they were somehow involved. Speculation has to be based on some semblance of fact. In other words, you can’t speculate that the dry cleaning people killed Missy. The police have confirmed they believe Missy was targeted. That’s a good place to start.
Thanks for posting. If you google some CG reviews online, you will notice there were quite some unhappy campers out there criticizing CG customer service and cancellation policy.
Perhaps an additional angle, if one is inclined to believe so.
-Nin
Ah, I see what you mean. I guess I wasn't familiar with the term "crock pot meals" being used to be sort of on a par with "latch key kids" or something like that.
I'd think a statistician or profiler would put her involvement at about as close to 0% as you could go.Is it just me, or for some of the rest of you, is it not mind-blowingly-bizarre how MB's mother-in-law has somehow become a target for suspicion, over the course of a number of pages here?
I have also seen that mentioned quite a few times. I did see a screenshot of a facebook post which said the 9am CG midlothian class was moving, but never saw one about the Creekside camp moving.
Having said that, I just went to the camp gladiator webpage to look up current location of their camps in Midlothian. It appears they are no longer running one at Creekside Church of Christ, or if they are I can find no evidence of it. For what it's worth, I wouldn't blame the church or CG for wanting it moved away.
http://ttdfw.campgladiator.com/locations/